Top chins cracked by Bob Foster

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Dec 27, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,111
    48,336
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have Hearns at #7 and Foster at #6. I think that's arguable, perfectly arguable, as in you could switch them quite happily. Where would you rank them relative to each other?
     
  2. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    About the same, maybe #7 and #8. My unconventional high ranker is Henry Armstrong, whose powerful reputation, I feel, is hurt by strictly decision-only footage salvaged on his behalf and none of those twenty six or twenty seven knockouts that happened consecutively in and around the 130lbs mark where he was undeniably most effective; though not typically described alongside more poised and technical punchers like Joe Louis or Ray Robinson, Armstrong made up for it in volume and therefore was one of the most formidable and consistent offensive forces as proved by his results.

    In contrast to that, I rate Ike Williams right up there (which I know you disagree with) due to a) various first hand accounts documenting his smaller-packaged, Robinson/Louis-esque prowess, much the same as those testifying to other greats' power such as Jimmy Wilde and Tommy Ryan and b) regardless of his apparent knockout inconsistencies (for which I'm sure there are valid reasons; him being boxer first, puncher second - fighting with 'the cuffs'* etc.) Williams nevertheless displays twice on film some of the most ferocious (TKO6 Jack) and precise (KO1 Gatica) punching I've ever seen - and those were reportedly but a smidgen on a more extensive and spectacular highlight reel (Bolanos I & III, Montgomery, West, Larkin, James...) that sadly no longer exists on film.

    *Which can get complicated considering Ike's blackballing and the fact he may have had to win unimpressively in order to get a more lucrative fight or carry an opponent, the emphasis here being on 'may have', although I would lean more towards 'likely to an extent.'

    But then we've argued on this before :cool:

    Anyway - Foster just above Hearns for me because he seemed to carry his power for longer.

    The aforementioned plus these...

    Archie Moore
    Joe Louis
    Ray Robinson
    Mike Tyson

    ... Will round out my top eight, in no particular order.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,111
    48,336
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree with your very high ranking of Armstrong. I have him at #8 in fact.

    Tier I: Louis, Robinson, Fitzsimmons, Langford, Tyson

    Tier II: Foster, Hearns

    Tier II: Armstrong, Roy Jones, Saddler,

    Tier III: Jackson, Shavers, Ketchel, Arguello, Liston, Gomez

    Tier IV: Moore, Zarate, Olivares, Dempsey

    Not sure what to do with McGovern...there's footage but I don't like it. I don't like ranking fighters without footage of them punching.

    Williams, I do think Ike was a brute, I think I would have him above McLellan, maybe Papke and Wilde, like 20-30 type range, I just don't think he is absolutely elite like you.

    http://www.boxing.com/the_15_greatest_composite_punchers_of_all_time.html
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,173
    Sep 15, 2009
    Great lhw foster. Undeniable power but never should have gone to lhw.

    I think his era gets a bit of unfair stick. He did beat all he could including a legend and a paper champ in roldan.

    His last fight with ahumada should have gone the other way imo but he was clearly past prime by then.

    Should be a lock for top 10.
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    It's a respectable list.
     
  6. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Olivares was about as one handed a great puncher as i've ever seen.

    It's not something i've though much on is rating punchers like this, but i'm surprised at you ranking him so high McGrain.I take it he scored highly enough on raw power and effectiveness for you to overlook that, but his style seems a bit too unique and unbalanced to rate as highly here.

    Be interested in your thoughts on him.

    Moore should be higher than Jones imo.Got to respect a man with that amount of clean knockouts.
     
  7. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Not sure about McGrain, but I rate these punchers based on overall offensive output and effectiveness regardless of method. Olivares does well according to that.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,111
    48,336
    Mar 21, 2007
    How do you mean one-handed? Like in terms of KO power?
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    And just in general fighting style.

    Not questioning his effectiveness, but he doesn't seem like the sort of balanced varied puncher i'd expect to see so high, not someone that immediately jumps out when i think the term "composite puncher".I'd have gone more for the likes of Jofre, Carlos Ortiz and Jose Napoles before him, even though they didn't hit quite as hard with any one single punch(well Jofre did imo).

    Was just curious on your thinking and criteria for the list and his(and i suppose the few others like Shavers who you could attribute a similar lack of "all-roundedness" to their game)inclusion.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,111
    48,336
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, fair enough.

    Well I looked at speed, technique on delivery, work-rate, accuracy, aggression, mercilessness, feinting, timing but mainly power - like power and destructive punching were the passport. But I basically don't agree with you that Olivares had a one-handed style. I think, like Frazier, he developed a nice line in a supporting role for his weaker hand. I think he tended to knock guys out with his good hand, but I don't agree that he looks one-handed, even early in his career.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XW90h8zOKeg[/ame]

    Just twenty seconds of that film shows a two-handed puncher throwing with real variety. His does most of his feinting with his left hand, but he splits up leading nicely and does more than enough work to keep Bisbal guessing...both knockouts are that punch, but you really think he looks one-handed getting there?
     
  11. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    I suppose i'd agree with most of what your saying there, and especially the Frazier comparison.I mean don't get me wrong i'm not saying he had no right hand at all, but i still think of him as in that sort of one-handed powerpuncher category at the end of the day- at least in this sort of overall punching ability context.Similar to DLH and Frazier.

    It would be enough of an issue for me to rate him lower than you do, though he'd crop up not too far distant.Some of the better punching light-heavies like Spinks and Saad would probably get above him.Or MUGABI.

    Got any lists for who you think are the better ones by weightclass? That might be worth a thread actually.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,111
    48,336
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here's how I would bottom line it for you. Olivares has the type of strong hand that categorises him as devastating. He qualifies as a devastating puncher based upon his left hand. But his right hand may actually be the more cultured of the two. That's a big call and I wouldn't insist upon it, but what i'm saying is that it adds dimenstions. On the one hand - you're right in what you say and I suppose I would have to admit that it's the reason that keeps him from what was a write up on the top 15 originally. So I excluded him from that write up because he's a one-handed knockout artists. But what i've taken to calling his "quilt" on offence was actually arguably enhanced by the right hand. That is, if he had two brutalising power punches, he wouldn't be the fighter he ended up as, perhaps.

    Would you argue that these guys were devastating punchers though? I think the difference here is that I stress power more than you do.

    No. That would be an absolutely enormous job.
     
  13. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,801
    11,429
    Aug 22, 2004
    Napoles is the first one that comes top mind when I think of a great "one-handed" fighter. He used his right very sparingly.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    But when he used it, man,...what the "derecho" did to Ernie Lopez:
    go to 4:47..
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tccXjGHUimU[/ame]
     
  15. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    Say what you want to about the quality of Foster's division, the fact is that he was the greatest hitter..the most devastating of all the lightheavies. Only the very elite would have had a chance in surviving with him...and they would have to box, box, box..