Marquez vs Pacquiao 5 . . . . why?

Nap ain't fighting non them *****s. They all work for panties promotions. Bob ain't having it

 

A 5th fight would be made in hopes of Marquez ageing overnight, so manny can get a clear win over him. That and to line the pockets of all involved

 

I'm sure it would be a decent fight, BUT if a million people will still buy it despite the complaints, they'll still have it.

 

People want to see a great action fight. My question: Isn't Pac-Rios or Pac-Alvarado a great action fight as well? Why can't we see something new and fresh? And why can't these young upcomers get a chance? JMM has already had numerous shots. Let someone else get a shot at Pac (or JMM).

People want Pac to have a chance to avenge his loss. My question: If he had numerous opportunities to KO Marquez but couldn't do it, what makes you think he can do it in a 5th fight? JMM gets better with every fight. Check the history. Also, part 4 was a chance for Pac to avenge his loss in 3rd fight. If Pac really believed he won part 3, he would've never fought JMM again.

5 is a bad idea for both fighters unless all they care about is money. If Pac fights JMM again Pac is desperate and can't accept a loss. If JMM agrees to fight, Juan looks like a cherry picker who thinks getting 10 wins over Pac will enhance his legacy (obviously it doesn't!). Juan needs to beat Bradley or Rios or Garcia to climb even higher on the ATG ladder. Or maybe another shot at Floyd (?)

 

Money duh...if a fifth fight happen you know you would be watching it so STFU.

 

No offense but some people never fail to impress me with their stupidity. How can anyone question why a fifth fight isn't necessary when we had four GREAT fights to enjoy? That said, do you honestly consider the result of the fourth fight completely final?, even when Pacquiao was leading and dominating only to get caught overexcited by a cautious, troubled/hurt yet smart and unexpectedly coherent Marquez?

If that's not enough let's look at it another way then. Remember when the great "Mexican brothers" of Marquez completely ignored him back when it mattered the most and never gave him a shot in hell only to see Pacquiao come out of the blue and give him the chance he truly proved he deserves? Despite the fight being a draw, Pacquiao offered Marquez a rematch only to see Marquez price his self out and fight Morales instead. Even after that, Pacquiao could have ignored Marquez but gave him a rematch. Then comes the third fight at a time when Pacquiao, yet again, could have completely ignored Marquez without getting ANY criticism for it whatsoever based on Marquez' complete failure to impress at the weight against Mayweather. Still Pacquiao gave him the shot and Marquez yet again, thanks to Pacquiao's chances, proved to be worthy. The fourth fight could have also been ignored since Pacquiao could have easily gone for Bradley, but no, Pacquiao gave him a shot when he didn't have to YET AGAIN. After all of that, you expect Marquez to completely turn his back on the man that gave him all these ridiculous chances?, especially when this is the very first time Pacquiao needs him.

Hope this post explains why a fifth fight is indeed necessary.

 

Because the tards need it to still think Manny is GOAT...why else

 

Okay, excuse me for bumping your thread, I should have read this post first. That's a hilarious trolling attempt we have here. Malignaggi?, Maidana?, Kell Brook?, Amir Khan?, Berto and Senchenko?

 

That's because you're a diehard pacquiao fan who will justify anything.

manny was leading by only a point before he got stopped, but he was in no way dominating the fight. This was the first time Marquez knocked him down for ffs.

Marquez beat him wide the third time but was robbed. He then proceeded to knock manny to sleep the fourth fight. Beat him once with a strong decision, and beat him again with a brutal ko. That's final. What more do you want Marquez to do in order to prove he's the better fighter? Assault manny in the ring and turn him into a vegetable?

I don't know why you're spouting so much rubbish. manny isn't this altruistic give to charity person when it comes to his opponent selection. He chose to fight Marquez after he exhausted all his other big name make money opponent options first. manny cherry picks margarito and Mosley before allowing the third Marquez fight to happen. He realized how old Marquez was and delayed it until it was the only big name make money fight option left. manny's plan of Marquez age catching up to him inevitably backfires as Juan upsets him. Of course, manny had the robbery set up in place. The fourth fight then occurs because manny was trying to save face and had to follow through with his plan. He made a robbery happen in order to make money off a rematch. What's he going to do? Not follow up with his money making idea?

If manny was as generous to Marquez as you claim, he would have taken a third fight with Marquez much sooner. Did he do that? No. When proposed with a rematch after the second fight he answers, "I don't think so. This business is over."

 

Why?

Because Pacquiao's stock drastically declined after that KO, he needs to redeem himself against the man who damn near killed him, then he can take on more big money fights. It's all about the money......

 

another war, good entertainmant :huh