Has Wlad done enough to establish lineage?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Jun 25, 2009.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    kell brook was offered a fight with Bradley for peanuts when he'd already secured a fight with brook for a decent split so the comparison ain't valid.

    Even when Sasha beat that fringe contender guy with a good record but really old, forget his name now. A black American. Even then in the interview they said 3 fights away from wlad atleast. I'm sure that was within 3 fights but I could be wrong.

    Has Sasha himself called out wlad recently?
     
  2. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,780
    24,653
    Jul 21, 2012
    Has Wlad called out AK? There is another thread for this where the WBA have threatened to strip Wlad
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think it shows people do care, just not the right people at the right time.

    Again I agree with what you're saying. But even in just the divisional history hart v root wasn't 1v2 (hart v Johnson in a rematch would have been). After Ali retired we wouldn't have seen a lineal champ until Tyson beat Spinks to unify every claim. So I think wlads championship claim is just as strong as Holmes was at the time.

    I don't say yuck, I think its noble your criteria is stuck to. I actually love your rankings they're great I just think the championship policy doesn't have the prestige required to mean anything significant. For me personally I wouldn't distinguish in prestige between the guy sat atop your rankings and the guy crowned champion, infact in the flyweight division I'd rank viloria number 1 as he's surpassed Igarashi as the best flyweight in the world.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    A champion doesn't call out his challenger. He's earnt the right to wait for challengers to come to him.

    Yeah I fully expect when they conclude the negotiations, any fighter who refuses will lose their wba belt. Sasha is again in a mandatory position lets hope this time he wants the fight (by the wording of the other thread I'd assume this is the case). With no other marquee name out there I see no good reason for wlad to fail in his mandatory obligations here.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,408
    48,822
    Mar 21, 2007
    It would be really, really nice to change that.

    You see, what interests me is that when The Ring first introduced it's 1 v 2 policy, also before the magazine was publicly compromised (twice), everyone was like ":huh yes...of course only 1 v 2 should crown a champion, what's the fuss?"

    In between then, and now, what has happened is the WBC, the WBA, dual compromises of Ring, the IBF etc. etc. etc. 1 v 2 alone crowning a champion has become a strange, alien concept. One that, to some people, apparently seems ridiculous to the point of stupidity.

    I consider that it is far, far less harmful to ignore a claim seen by fans as "legitimate" but which also doesn't have a legitimate crowning event than it is to say "we have rules and we are sticking to them." Now more than ever.

    Agree, I guess. I'm not really expert on historical lineage, my interest is kind of stopping with the problems we have now.

    Hell no it doesn't. There's no title belt and no money. But it's only a couple of months old. I'll be honest: i expect it to fail. But it is still worth trying. I'd just add that when Ring rankings began the notion that they would one day crown the most prestigious title in the world (Arguably the case in the early 00's) would have been seen as utterly ludicrous.

    What i will say, is that as the offical rankings of ESB, The Sweet Science and Boxing.com TBR has a huge number of potential views, and is not insignificant.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    It would be great to see it change and I hope it does sooner rather than later. As I say I live the idea I just think it's not consistent with the current climate.

    Forgive me, when I say insignificant what I mean is that Wlad is still considered world HW champ regardless of the boards policy. Now with enough articles listing your non champs as merely contenders (like stoneys great article on wlad) maybe it will get more people discussing it (like we are now) and maybe just maybe that will one day lead to a question in an interview and a return of the importance of the lineal claim.

    I want all this to happen, believe me I do. Its transparent, consistent, fair it ticks all the right boxes.
     
  7. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,780
    24,653
    Jul 21, 2012
    A champion wants to fight the best ,is willing to fight the best and has always called out the best.What mickey mouse school of boxing did you go to??
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,408
    48,822
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah.

    I wonder what ESB, Boxing.com and SS's turnover for visitors in a month would be combined with Ring's circulation in the 1920's? I'm curious about that now. The difference is hardly anyone clicks on links that say "rankings" these days becasue they tend to just see the alphabet boys and their list of paying fighters.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    A champion wants to fight the best of course but the onus isn't on them to call out anyone. The challenger challenges, the champion accepts.

    I went to no school of boxing, I'm just a fan is the sport and claim to be nothing more.
     
  10. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    A Champion has to call out nobody!!!!

    Champion can wait to defend his belts!!!

    Wlad fought all his mandatory fights and never refused to fight anybody including Alexander Povetkin!!! He refuses to fight Wlad.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,408
    48,822
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: You two boys should settle this alone.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    That is my biggest issue with alphabelts in the sanctioning fees.

    I do agree with mandatories and title elimators to make a challengers position official but rankings should be fought over and not paid for.

    People dont have to click on links as long as there are threads and articles keeping the issue current.

    I kinda blame zsolt erdei for the demise of the lineal championship. Perhaps unfair I guess but I hold him responsible :lol:
     
  13. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    :good

    2 times!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  14. FeldMunster

    FeldMunster Member Full Member

    473
    0
    Jan 6, 2007
    Yes IB,

    I have argued with them back and forth. They clearly stand on the rigid, purist side of things. What's even worse is that if Vitali retired, they expect Wladimir to face Haye AGAIN, as he is currently ranked #3 and would theoretically be pushed up to #2. I could only shake my head in disbelief.
     
  15. ikeabuchia

    ikeabuchia Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,012
    22
    Aug 23, 2004
    Yes Wladimir is definitely a HOF ATG for sure and has established a lineage no doubt :)