Pacquiao > Chavez

don't think so. everything I say, I write about something else. they say its steriods or that some carpentier climbed as many divisions as manny when he did not. they just making fools outa themselves.

not at all, enough people are on my side and boxrec doesnt lie, go watch for yourself how many guys with realy bad records chavez fought. paid sparring like I said.

 

wait a minute, before you keep on puting words in anybodys mouth theey did not said.

I never said that chavez was not great. chavez is great. I just said, that compared to pacquiao achievemants chavez did not look so great.

when I favor orange over ananas doesn't mean that I don't think ananas tastes good smart ass :****off

manny is far more athletic and would beat the **** outa chavez.

manny climbed 10 divions blasting everybody away.
chaveu did not.

manny is fighter of the decade.
chavez wasn't.

manny was longer the p4p king than chavez.

and now finaly, because ya wanna here it.

manny would have blasted that overrated pernell away and fu....yall :admin

 

if you call getting knocked down like 5 times in 4 fights by pacquiao and overall winning more rounds in there last bout a ****, than you have no clue what you talking about. and by the way, marquez is a hell of a fighter, stronger than chavez and would probably beat him.

 

This content is protected

 

oh pernell had 46 fights, oh pernell beat julio cesar vasquez or buddy mcgirt, guys with combined 20 losses.

pernell did nothing but lose to top boxers like he did vs tito or oscar.

in a era with the likes of marque, pacquiao, mayweather he just would get wrecked.

 

I don't know if something is wrong with your eyes, but marquez looks 100 % stronger and more athletic than chavez. and thats a prime chavez foto.

This content is protected

This content is protected