Hagler vs Roldan compared to Hagler vs Mugabi?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Jan 1, 2013.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    The troubles Hagler had with Mugabi is often taken as a sign of his decline. That Leonard says he saw something that convinced him he could beat Hagler reinforces this point

    But looking at Hagler's fight against Roldan in 1984, when most think he still was in his prime, I don't see much difference. In this fight he also has a tough time initially and takes some huge punches that would have taken out a lesser man (even though the KD only was a glorfied slip), to eventually take over and stop his guy.

    Your take?
     
  2. Rex Tickard

    Rex Tickard Active Member Full Member

    818
    14
    Dec 29, 2012
    Was it so much the "troubles" as it was Hagler's own form? - i.e: his punches appeared to be slower and wider against Mugabi.

    Also I wouldn't be surprised if Roldan was better than Mugabi. His only losses since competing at the world class level were to the elite - Hagler, Hearns, Nunn. He didn't lose to the likes of Duane Thomas right after fighting Hagler.
     
  3. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    I'll say this - there was absolutely, unequivocally no thumb to the eye, just as the knockdown was not a knockdown.

    I do think Hagler was slowing and looked out of sorts but any difficulties were probably due to Roldan's awkward attack.

    I actually thought Hagler first looked slower in the second Hamsho fight, even if the manner of victory seemed impressive. He was no longer fresh and bouncy (sounds a bit gay).

    Hagler was best in his red shorts as opposed to blue (even gayer).
     
  4. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,498
    3,080
    Feb 17, 2008
    Marvin had lost those quick legs by the Roldan fight. He used to have a real quick first and second step and he'd throw accurately while moving those feet. By the time of Roldan, he was pretty much planting his feet to do anything.

    And then he goes and fights a real tough trio of youthful pedigreed fighters that's very difficult to go 3-0 against. You just don't see matches with old champs taking on the up and comers in 3 straight fights. Just who signs those contracts? Let alone going 3-0.
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Yeah, it must have been Mugabi's speed and reflex advantage. Leonard must have wet himself with excitement upon that revelation.

    Seriously though, you have to agree - red shorts Hagler was a lot better than the 'destruction and destroy' (never made sense of that) Hagler of blue shorted fame.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    That's true. He had a couple of wild swings with that left, which was unusual for him.

    His career took a turn downwards after facing Hagler. Could have something to do with the punsihment Hagler gave him.

    Saw someone here post something about that Mugabi had more boxing skills than given credit for and would show them in the gym. But come fight night he was more likely to rely on his power.

    But with that said I don't know if Mugabi outboxed Hagler anymore than Roldan did. Mugabi largely relied on his reach advantage while Roldan had a good deal of success with a right uppercut counter. Awkward as he was, he showed some really nice moves in there.
     
  7. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Roldn would give loads of middles issues in the early rounds.He was a beast there.Mixture of that and hagler starting to slow signs of aging.

    Problem for Roldan was he was a frontrunner that tended to get discouraged if you were able to come out of those early rounds still firing back.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,075
    12,981
    Jan 4, 2008
    He was also putting an awful lot behind every blow. That will tire you out if it doesn't have the effect you hope for.
     
  9. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    it wasnt the Hagler of the Sibson fight who was about as strong as Roldan. back then it looked as if Hagler was capable of anything against anyone and seemed to have an unlimited future. Like many fighters he started to level off after peaking and became slow & hittable

    I agree, taking on too many young fighters hastened his departure. He was slowing & getting hit more & more altho I thought he looked dynamite vs Hamsho rematch. That right hook would have destroyed anyone past present or future. Too much raw power to stand up to.

    seemed to be a shadow of his old self in the Mugabi fight, reminding me of a week old balloon. about the only weapon left with any effect was his right jab

    was terrible from that point on. I'm glad he retired
     
  10. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    96
    Jul 20, 2010
    Mickey Duff and George Francis (RIP) had Mugabi study films of Roberto Duran against Hagler and were impressed with Duran's success. So they designed his strategy based upon that. Like Duran, Mugabi attempted to counterpunch the counterpuncher. You'll notice he didn't come out swinging for the fences like he usually did.

    Mugabi had some success (including that titanic uppercut that rocked Marv's head back[and was, for the record, a counter-shot]). But I wouldn't say he was ever "outboxing" Hagler.