Try watching about half his MW career through to Calzaghe. The Tarver, Pavlik, Pascal fights being exceptions with dispicable horror like Jones II sprinkled in.
Disagree, not necessarily, that's what an outside-fighter is. There are plenty of mid-range and even short boxer types. A boxer-puncher to me describes someone who uses conventional boxing tools with more of an offensive edge, Tito Trinidad being a perfect example. Hopkins' style is broader and less aggressive than that; he's not a strict outside fighter, and even though he can change range like a boxer puncher, his priority is to hit and not get hit, using all terrains in the ring, not to inflict a particular amount of damage or focus on his offense.
His style has changed over the years. He used to be a very physical mauler, who would apply pressure interspersed with periods of text book boxing and counter punching. Earlier on in his career he was sometimes even reckless and throw wild shots from the outside. As he's aged, slowed down and the power he once had faded he's altered his style, become more of a counter puncher, more off a spoiler. He uses movement to keep his opponent out of position and having to reset. But overall I would say he is a text book boxer. He does everything correctly. Throws punches with proper technique, doesn't telegraph his punches, keeps his chin tucked in, very economical with his movements. Through out his career he's faced faster opponents, bigger opponents, harder punches and each time it's his technique that has allowed him to compete.
For me a boxer is an outside fighter to be honest. Some boxing fans think an inside fighter is different from a swarmer and that a swarmer is different from a pressure fighter. And that a slugger is different from a brawler. I don't like how people come out with stuff like mid range and short range fighter, keep it simple For me these are the only boxing styles Inside fighter: the same as a swarmer, pressure fighter Outside fighter: the exact same as a boxer Slugger: the same as a brawler Boxer Puncher Counterpuncher And thats it as far as I'm concerned, there's too many confusion about styles, some boxers fall into the style of Unconventional, guys like Roy Jones Jr, Sergio Martimez and Prince Naseem Hamed. So for me Hopkins is either a boxer-puncher or counterpuncher. I'll need to watch a few more of his fights.
I can see where you're coming from, but I don't feel comfortable labeling the second half of his career "boxer-puncher". He boxes and changes the range and angle to his preference but isn't aggressive enough for that label. So to me he's simply a boxer, who does everything by the book and adds his own sly tricks on top of it.