in the last month ive watched all 3 over again, i think it the 3rd fight wasnt such a wipe out that this trilogy was better than the JMM one i thought Morales vs Pac 1 and 2 were better than both JMM fights the first fight was all Morales, it was close not like a wide victory but he was in control the whole way and was ahead the whole way i felt and showed a separation in class even in fight 2 he jumped out to an early lead and was ahead on Lederman's card at the midway point then Pacquiao surged and just dominated and beat up Morales leaving me to wonder what happened?
Pacquiao made up for it by beating the crap out of Erik twice. They each landed the same amount of punches in the 2nd fight. Erik just couldn't handle the power after the pillow gloves were removed.
if you think that one was getting beaten the **** out of him in that fight, i assume getting stunned is the same as floored to you.
The only people who overrated him were *******s and the Networks who tell the casual fan who to pay for.
Some Morales and Pac hater complete to ignore is that the Pac that Morales beat is not in his prime. Pac also has a very bad cut.
You're guy fought a bunch of handpicked opponents. De La Hoya took on everyone, and the one guy he did not fight was Winky Wright, and Winky turned down his biggest pay day for whatever reason. :deal That quote above is awesome, because a prime DLH would **** Pacquiao worse than Morales did, and would KTFO Pacquiao with his "rocket left-hook"...:deal Key word: Prime baby :hey Where's the glory in beating a bunch of over the hillers?