How gullable, do people really believe this **** or are they that blinded by fanboy delusion that they cannot see the wood for the trees? nutlol::roflatsch
C'mon gimperial, lets here your delusional speech on how PED's are actually detromental to a fighter lol::roflatsch
Yeah, that's not a good combo. But still, there is a failed drug test and quite a bit of anecdotal evidence that Roy, like many of his peers juiced. The Joe Cal nuthuggers are annoying. I can't believe anybody would rate that guy highly, but this is one thing they have. There was never any suspicion involving him. Obviously. Just look at the guy.
Right, You only stopped caring about Froch once he was outclassed by Ward in a one sided match, at least give credit to Froch as he was more willing than Calzaghe to actually have a go against opponents who weren't shot to pieces or past their best and go for a proper title rather than holding some belt called the WBO in Europe.
You talk about delusion then go on and say he had umpteenth amounts of testosterone in his body Pot meet Kettle.
Well I'm sure he would have failed before 2001 if that was the case. The thing is, his opponent, Richard Hall failed as well. Has their ever been another case where both fighters test positive, post fight?
The Jones defenders should be ashamed of themselves. He was caught red handed on the juice with a ridiculously higher testosterone level. Then his legal team offer the typical 'he didn't know what he was taking' three weeks later. I wonder if these same posters who defend Jones would be just as willing to believe Pacquiao if he failed a drug test and then claimed several weeks later, via his legal team, that it had all been a mistake. Idiots atsch Jones was busted at a time where fighters were rarely tested and there was no real protocol to address a failed test. Him and his opponent were juiced up, got sloppy and wasn't expected to get busted for it. No amount of desperate fanboyism is going to change that.
I give Froch credit for travelling but even his biggest fans cannot deny that he is a limited plodder made to look foolish everytime he has fought any kind of skilled boxer - taylor, dirrell, ward. Froch reminds me of Clinton Woods in the fact that he has made the very most of his limited skill set but in any other 168 era, i don't think he ever becomes a belt holder.
None that I can think of. Considering the porous nature of testing in boxing, especially at that time, it is amazing that it happened.
Sensational, spell binding, 5 star posting Shaunster, sizzling in truth, smoking in accuracy and drenched in mouth-wateringly delicious irrefutable scientific fact, delivered in crystal clear HD before a global audience of millions :yep