Till he go's pro this mean nothing, WSB is waste of time, unless they can get there boxing victory an DEFEATS put toward there record, it just does not mean as much. Who to say he fights a different guy in Maxell (the boxer he fought in that clip) if this was going toward's his life time Pro record, he might not of even took the fight knowing he needs to grow as a Pro. I hope he takes up the pros, but one of the hard parts about it, is just doing it. Specialy in urkraine were there top Ams are well taken care of... It is time to let the next young buck take over an move on.
If a fighter appears unbeatable and doesn't get beaten then they get put into those discussions. Roy Jones was talked about in those terms after Ruiz, so was a young Tyson. Will have to wait and see what happens, he's potential.
I m a huge cuban amateur boxing fan and I know some boxers, trainers and ppl who manages numbers I had him in 488 wins 4 losses..what I call more dominant amateur ever are the likes of Savon, Stevenson, kindelan, Hector Vinent...I don't want to argue with you man but those are amateurs ATG..
Many people are claiming Lomachenko has an amateur record of 400-1. Would someone please show me valid proof of this record. I can't find any proof on the internet.
You're not going to find any proof but if he had lost more than one fight it would be very easy to prove. From 2008 the word was that he had 300+ wins and 1 loss. If he has more than one loss it hasn't been on the world stage. At 8:40 of this video Lomachenko touches on it: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrFeAC3XrSM[/url]
So your going on the word of the guy himself? The guy who acts like a cocky bugger, taunting opponents and driving around in flash cars. dealt_with I presumed you knew what you were talking about. However, it is clear you are making up numbers. There is simply no proof that this guy has won 400 fights and only lost once. Stop over hyping people you know nothing about. You don't even know this guy's actual record and dare to make a thread completely nuthugging him. If all you know he could have lost the first 10 fights of his career.... atsch
There's a few numbers around for Rigo but all of them seem to say he had 12 losses. He had at least 3 losses on the world stage and you claim the Cuban comp is toughest.. [url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Guillermo_Rigondeaux_Ortiz[/url] Kindelan had 22 losses, Savon had 21 losses, Stevenson 22 losses. Lomachenko had similar achievements and only 1 loss. That is dominance. He is also an ATG amateur.
dealt_with do you have alzheimer's?? Two minutes go you claimed you knew this guy's record because he said it on a video recording off himself on Youtube.... Lets be honest you don't have a clue whatsoever what this person's record is and instead your making up numbers. GTFO you clueless troll. atsch
atsch There's talk of his record all over the internet, there was a Ukrainian guy on here who confirmed that it was true as well. In this day and age you can't make outrageous claims without getting found out, the fact that it's been the word all that time and noone has said hey here's another fight he lost indicates that it is true. There's footage of Lomachenko back to when he was a little kid. Nobody knows actual amateur numbers you idiot, the exceptional ones you usually only hear how many losses they've had and a ballpark figure of how many fights.
I am not taking your word whatsoever. It is clear you don't know what the **** you are talking about. What idiotic person makes his presumption on a figher's record by a comment made on Youtube?
Okay I'm lying, Lomachenko is lying and there are in fact hidden videos of Lomachenko's losses that have never turned up despite everything on the world scene being filmed by impartial observers. It's a conspiracy.
Well said. Loma's exceptional footwork, footspeed, and balance will enable him to slip and score without getting caught more often than not. This kid is a special talent. Indeed he's one of the exceedingly rare fighters that blends extraordinary athleticism with techincal prowess.