Miguel Vasquez: what's the deal?!

:good

 

nicely put, still, Rickys jab is much more active, so that may make up for the spearlike but more economical jab of Prescott, and the inches aren't that much different, an inch or two here or there. I don't think either fighter has fought someone with attributes quite like the other, so this should be an interesting one

either way, I can't wait.

One thing I will say, there seems to be a lot of people who think Burns is overlooking Vazquez, where they get that idea I don't know (oh yeah, because he ducked Broner, so therefore must see Vazquez as a gimme.. :nut)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va38rj1Mlrk

 

me neither

 

Not quite as aggressive though IB, Moses had to work forward for the success he had

 

As far as the General goes, if Ricky wins,Vasquez will be shite and an overrated feather fist,whilst if Vasquez wins,he'll be considered a good tune up fight for Broner before he goes to 140.
Guy's a solid belt holder and it's been quickly forgotten that the vast majority had him at #1 before he toiled v Quintero.
Fickle lot at times on the Gen.

 

I still have him #1. :conf

Yeah he'd likely be KTFO by Broner, but that kid's had TWO outings at lightweight.

If Ricky beats him, he becomes the man.

 

I'm not questioning you for a second mate, but does the Escobedo debacle count as him coming in at LW?
Genuine question with no contradictory intent.