Why not Mayweather vs Trout?

These are facts, ha I'm not even a Mayweather fan but *******s lie about facts.

 

Doubt that he's that small; but I would bet money that his seed has been in more vagina then you'll sniff in ten lifetimes.

You mean, like JMM? Cotto agreed to the "drain." All of his opponents agreed to the terms of their fights.

ODLH was too old to be fighting either Mayweather or Pacquiao, but Pac fought him five years ago. In recent history all of his opponents were top tier contenders.

I'll give Mayweather credit for Shane Moseley, even though he was still an old fighter. For the most part, Pac's recent fight history is superior to FMJ's. Intellectual dishonesty on your part reveals a secret attraction to FMJ.

I don't blame you, he's sexy, how often do you pray that you'll get pregnant with his child? 2, 3 times a day?

 

:!: gay

 

Oh no, please don't say things are "facts" when it's just a stupid opinion on your part. Most countries have a series of educational institutions that can prevent such ignorance from becoming a permanent character defect. "School" is usually free for the mentally disabled; and they can teach you how to tie your shoes. Please consider attending.

 

Hell yeah I can tell Pacquiao is faking fake ass smile, just a waste.

 

You see Pac-scum, you can't argue the facts just personal name calling, I can't help that your hero got knocked out *****.

 

Trout would be incredibly **** faced if he found out he got a fight with Mayweather

 

Margarito was considered a dangerous fighter by most in the fight world after the event happened. Pacquiao moved up in weight to fight him. After the fact spin is all well and dandy, but there was no "duck" involved in fighting Margarito.

Pacquiao doesn't duck. He fought JMM twice and a series of highly rated and dangerous opponents. FMJ fought less frequently against less dangerous opposition. Those are facts.

I'm not a ******* and I don't hate FMJ. Just brining objectivity to this discussion. Remember, go to school.

 

Your a *******, you can tell by the name calling and the fact that you claim Pacquiao never ducked. Let's do a ******* test. What is your opinion of Pacquiao's use of catchweight?


The fact that you give credit to Pacquiao is foul to, your basically saying it's cool Margarito cheated, I'm a Judah fan I wouldn't give him credit for Margarito so what does it say that you give Pacquiao credit for a broken man?

 

I left out ODLH because FMJ fought him in 2007. If you insist on bringing up ODLH (who was old) then I'll have to go ahead and add Jorge Solis, David Diaz, Marco Antonio Barrera, and a third fight with Marquez to Pacquiao's list.

So now we have Pacquiao's six year, 13 man campaign against Mayweather's six year, 6 man campaign.

According to you, ODLH was a "true" champion in 2007 appropriately retired by Mayweather. In reality he was sufficiently beaten by several opponents and fighting sporadically. He was truly retired by Pacquiao, and ODLH admitted as much to George Lopez after he was destroyed by him a year later.

Floyd's recent history pimps Plankman's..

"Weight-drain" and "styles make fights." Maybe FMJ is too balls deep for your mind to work appropriately.

Pacquiao doesn't duck, that's why he fought JMM three times in the span it took FMJ to fight Cotto and Hatton.

Shane was old and had no endurance. Whipped Mayweather in one round, which five years ago might've been six and a KO.

Cotto, along with ODLH and Hatton, got their asses truly whipped by Pacquiao. Cotto, Hatton, and ODLH all had success against Mayweather. Only Cotto had a measure of success against Pacquiao.

It's good to have that inside information on Cotto. Clearly it was the ear ringing that defeated him in that matchup and not anything to do with Pacquiao who correctly interpreted, along with puppet master Bob Arum, that Cotto would be sufficiently drained and plastered so Pacquiao could cruise to a victory. You have high talent in stupid and inane. Cotto took the fight because he though he could win and make money, and he turned to his bicycle. Cotto was not forced into the matchup and agreed to the conditions to fight the smaller man at a weight class in which most believe Cotto was best at.

Ortiz would make sense for a three time a year fighter. Margarito was a piece of ****, but he was dangerous when Pac faced him.

 

Raging *******

 

Oooo, are we butthurt? You poor baby :|

I don't think I said Pacquiao "never" ducked. I'm saying it's not what he does generally. In recent history the "ducker" has been FMJ compared to Pacquiao. The original question: "Why don't we put pressure on Pacquiao to fight Thomas instead of talking about Mayweather?" The correct answer: "Pacquiao fights difficult (for him) opponents more frequently than Mayweather, so your comparison stems from ignorance and/or butthurt from Floyd's *****."

Pacquiao controls with herr Arum the catchweight blight that has infested professional boxing. This dual axis of evil forces men against their will to transform into tiny centipedes incapable of action in the squared circle. No other boxers in history have used a catchweight, and it's a proven, objective fact that all catchweights eliminate any threat of defeat for the two dictators solely responsible for their use. Questions of weight and size, mutual contract obligations, and credit for victory are thrown out the window because we all know that Pacquiao is the catchweight king.

Did I pass the ******* test? If so, pretending to be a pussyboy is far easier than it seems.

Margarito is as far as I'm concerned a piece of ****. If he knew that he was being wrapped then he's guilty of attempted murder.

I understand, however, that Margarito was a contender at the time, and questions about the extent of his cheating and his complicity in it were dubious and still are. Margarito is just one example of how Pacquiao does not "duck" his opponents in recent history, especially when compared with Floyd.