lol i wrote it looked at it then said to myself at least ill get some giggles while ****ers argue blind with me lol...
tyson had a period where he was top dog and thats great.but beating fighters like tubbs and smith dosnt make you some insane beast who would walk through every hw in history.. ill stick by my statement the 80s and early 90s was a terrible talent pool.. would you not agree tysons best win is against a semi retired holmes?? tyson was well matched with sluggers....but saying that there wasnt much else to offer in the 80s early 90s so i guess the point im trying to make dosnt really matter.. also how the **** can you be this insane man who can walk through anyone but have the shortest prime.. you wont change my mind buddy
losing 5 times dosnt mean anything... tyson was a great fighter and belongs in the top 15 of all time.. he just isnt the monster some people make him out to be
at people claiming Tyson cherry-picked to get his titles. He won the WBA, WBC, IBF and Ring titles within 8 fights from his first title win, all in seperate fights. You could argue there were weak champions at the time and he was lucky in that respect, but saying Tyson avoided anyone or was matched carefully is idiocy.
The early 90s had young Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe, Tyson, Ruddock, Mercer, Morrison, old Foreman, old Holmes, Bruno, Witherspoon & more. If thats a terrible talent pool I'd love to see a strong one
But while he was at his best, thats exactly what he did Let me guess, you think the current era is one of the greatest Same Holmes who would on until he was about 50, schooled Ray Mercer much better than Lennox did and was never knocked out, only by Tyson. Mcall Kod Lewis, but never came close to Koing Holmes. You really dont know ****ing **** about boxing, Tyson made his career out of beating boxers, not sluggers but actual boxers. Berbick, Thomas, Tubbs, Tucker and Holmes were all boxers Name one heavyweight who achieved as much as Tyson by the age of 21? Unified champion, with hundreds of millions in his pocket and 36-0. None, not one
If we are talking primes, I think Wlad KO's Tyson in 8. Tyson is too little and Wlad would wear him down with his grab and jab technique until Tyson mentally quit. Then Wlad would go for the knockout.
5 of Tyson's 6 losses came when he was already past his prime. He was the youngest champ ever. He was undisputed at age 21. No Klitschko was ever undisputed. The Klitschko brothers lost 5 times between them,all by TKO. HAHAHA!
If we are talking primes,Wlad would be KO'd in about 8 seconds. Wlad was scared of David Haye! He didnt go for the kill against Haye so how would he fight better against a stronger,scarier man? Tyson was too small? Tyson was 220 pounds! Tyson beat 2 guys as big as Klitschko in his career. And in his prime,Tyson's mind was strong. Watch him beat Tony Tucker for 12 rounds. Tucker clinched as much as Wladimir,had good handspeed and one punch KO power. Tyson KO2 Klitschko
Old tyson had lewis holding so much in first 2 rounds he got warned and lost a point Mormeck a very poor mans tyson got grabbed and held 20 times in first round by Wlad Only question in this fight is does tyson knock Wlad out before he is DQed for holding out of fear
This :deal Coming from a Lennox fan... Klitschko fans and Lennox fans are the worst fans on here. Prime Tyson destroy Lewis and Klitschko any time, any day. Lewis holds and then punches his opponent. What a cheater...