You don't seem to be getting the point or question. I do know what the public thought about the third fight, I know many that gave it to Pacquiao, many more that scored it a draw and many that gave it to Marquez(myself included). Fact is, it was a close fight and close fights go either way. Did Pacquiao OWE Marquez that third fight?, he could have easily ignored him and fought Bradley or anyone else, correct? That's my point, Pacquiao gave him FOUR shots. Now it's Marquez, for the first time, that owes Pacquiao and is backing the hell off. It's sad that cabdrivers like you are backing it off, then again scumbags were supporting and consolidating Margarito's loaded gloves so this is nothing surprising.
Did you know that other fights pay too?, as far as I remember the majority of the public saw the third Marquez fight as a complete JOKE and mismatch of a fight leading up to it.
The 3rd fight proved that he can comprehensively outbox Pacquiao using his timing and counterpunching if he so chooses. For the 4th fight, he promised everyone he'd take a more aggressive approach and look for the knockout, which is exactly what he did. Pacquiao is obviously the quicker fighter, so in an all out war he's going to have success against almost anyone, and certainly JMM. JMM was willing to take those risks and take that punishment in order to find that perfect counter punch and take Pacquiao out. He fought a fight a fight that suited Pacquiao and STILL came up with the win. If that doesn't prove his dominance, I don't know what does. That KO punch was all about skill and timing. He allowed Pacquiao to use his aggression, and inevitably Pacquiao got over aggressive, running face first into trouble. JMM is one of the best counterpuncher's in the game, and one of the most skillful at implementing timing to great effect. I'm sorry but if you think that punch was luck, you don't know boxing.
Then you need to get on your knees, as you're used to, and kneel down to that picture. Without him you would still have nothing to celebrate in boxing.
And who else was there Scar? And I certainly didn't see it as a mismatch, I just saw it as kinda "blah, here we go again." How could it be viewed as a mismatch when there has never been a clear winner between the two until recently? A draw and 2 disputed split decisions is a mismatch? Reality is: Arum had run out of credible opponents to cherry pick for Pacquiao, so he went back to old faithful, JMM. Arum just didn't count on the punch heard round the world. Arum figured time had finally caught up to JMM and that Manny would finally beat him convincingly. Again, they totally under-estimated the skill of JMM while over-estimating Pacquiao's. When you consider that Pacquiao won't fight anybody that works with GBP, or anybody not given the OK by Bob Arum for that matter, then the list of credible opponents grows even shorter.
His name and his old age, which is why Arum signed the 3rd fight at welterweight after years of saying no to it.
I agree with the people that say Pac didnt win that third fight with Marquez . But then again Marquez did not win that third fight either . I scored that fight a DRAW .
Scar doesnt know **** about boxing.....because hes not like you and bases everything off this flamewar between *****s like you and *******s? The ultimate irony is that you ***** dick suckers were jumping on Pac's nuts for not giving JMM ANOTHER rematch after he won, now all of a sudden JMM gets one and its completely fine for him not to return the favor. Basically as long as Pac is on the losing side of the equasion you are happy, anyone else dont know **** about boxing :roll:
He could have ignore him, but didn't...you know why??? Because he knew that he never got the better of Juan, and now would be the perfect opportunity to take the fight and get that clear win he has wanted...Do you honestly believe Pac would have given him a chance if say Marquez was leading on all cards and Manny managed to KO him? **** no he wouldn't. atsch If Pacquiao was so generous like some of you idiots are making him out to be and really felt like he wanted to give Juan a chance, then he would have ****ing gave the 3rd fight immediatley after the 2nd fight, but..."I don't think so, this buisness is over". And at you bringing up the Margo issue that has aboslutley **** to do with any of this....Desperate much, fan boy?
i doubt if there's a bigger fight for marquez out there than a fifth pacquiao fight. it's one of the biggest fight to be made this year. boxing needs it.
So wait? Did Bradley not give Pacquiao a chance to get his belt back? What happened there? Why was Timmah! Swept under the rug? Why does everyone act like that fight didn't happen...