Will you pay ppv for Froch vs Kessler?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Bronxbull666, Feb 9, 2013.


  1. Hullk

    Hullk Member Full Member

    488
    13
    Sep 6, 2010
    I tried for 2 tickets together up to £80 each, could not get them at all, only £100+ left before an hour was gone. ****in' touts should all be kicked in the **** by a pair o' steelies.

    Just wanted to put a few points over as to why PPV for this fight could be a good thing too.

    These are the fights that should be getting coverage, being watched and spoken about and PPV is a way of monetarily incentivising these type of fighters to get in the ring together and take some bash for their cash.

    The more exciting, 50/50, toe-to-toe fights between two respectful warriors at the top level of their division that get made, the better, and if promoters see that these fights make more money it may help these riskier match-ups to get made, which gives us better fights to watch and also attracts more casuals which is all good long-term for the sport.

    I'll be watching at a mates and chipping in a few quid.
     
  2. jackukmma

    jackukmma Active Member Full Member

    720
    0
    Jun 12, 2012
    I'm going to it it luckily. Way I see it I paid for the 1st fight an this is PPV quality so why wouldn't I pay for this one? If it was just me watching it it may well depend on quality of undercard. But even then, jut get 2 Myra round have a night on the beers watch the footy all throw a fiver each in and have a great night. Couldn't think of much better myself
     
  3. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    dont think ill watch on ppv, lets face it undercard is gonna be absolute bollox not worth the money for it imo, i refuse to fork up for these ppv fights that are not worth it......im from the old school when ppvs were the business and well worth your money
     
  4. phonk

    phonk Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,080
    0
    Oct 19, 2007
    Yes. Yes i bloody well will be (providing it's not on at silly o'clock i.e. 2am start)
     
  5. Marlow

    Marlow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    1
    May 5, 2010
    Despite being a fan of new age promoting I will be slating Eddie if the undercard is poor.

    Barker/Lee would be a quality support bout.

    Brook won't be on it, Frampton is back out on 11th May and seems to be an attraction now in Ireland.

    You'd have to assume Yafai will be there and sadly McCloskey.
     
  6. Surely as a professional boxer Froch has the right to make as much money as possible from each fight and if PPV gets him more money then he would be mad at best to turn it down
     
  7. Wig

    Wig Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,785
    4,229
    May 31, 2010

    Yeah man! Power to the people!

    You sure showed them, by not increasing the £1,140 per year you spend on television to £1,155.

    Its a victory for the common man!

    ****ing mug.:lol:
     
  8. Wig

    Wig Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,785
    4,229
    May 31, 2010

    You are so disgusted by PPV that you are going to pay for it.

    That'll show them!

    :dead
     
  9. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    I'll pay for it, gutted I didn't get a ticket.
     
  10. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Your logic is backwards. The money that Froch is apparently asking for is likely out of keeping with what he generates. Really, he should be winding his demands back in rather than going on PPV - IMO. I don't demand a payrise because I'm amazing, I need to show I generate the income that would warrant it.

    Inflated pay packages are part of the problem with boxing, especially as i becomes more and more marginalised.

    Also, sticking the best fights on PPV, away from where casual fans might casually come across them, seems something of a contradiction in terms if that's what you think PPV will do.

    PPV has never been a good thing. It's a broken model that limits your potential audience for a short-term gain. Pretty much boxing's problem as a sport.
     
  11. AliShuffle

    AliShuffle Active Member Full Member

    1,380
    0
    Sep 27, 2012
    I'll probably pay for it.
     
  12. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    4
    Jan 31, 2010
    No. Mostly down to my shitty financial situation since going back to college.
     
  13. Dennison

    Dennison Guru Full Member

    3,086
    1
    Oct 24, 2011
    They said they will be putting on a big undercard but realistically who could it be....
    Bellew - Fights less than 2 months before so not enough time
    Barker - Probably fights on it but only has 11 weeks to prepare
    Rees - Could fight on it for WBA title (if he loses V Broner)
    Mccloskey - zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    Brook - If he fights Alexander it will clash (could fight Vacant title on the bill)
    Frampton - Fighting May 11th at Odyssey
    Ryder - Only 'big' fight realistically would be V Saunders
    Purdy - Has to beat Carson Jones and then who could he fight?

    To me there looks no BIG fights to be made, realistically the best we could get is Rees fighting for WBA title (when does Abril fight for it) and Barker V Lee
     
  14. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    1
    Apr 24, 2011
    I'd pay 50 if I had to, guaranteed war.
     
  15. boxingbrummie

    boxingbrummie Member Full Member

    240
    0
    Oct 21, 2012
    didnt they say the best of each stable will be going up against each other or something