Had Muhammad Ali not gotten Parkinsons

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MMJoe, Feb 13, 2013.


  1. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Would he have been fighting at 48 years old and confounding young champions and contenders with ring savy and experience like Bernard Hopkins is doing today?
     
  2. Smashgar

    Smashgar McMustache Nuthugger Full Member

    1,063
    7
    Jul 15, 2012
    No, his style was very reflex-dependent.
     
  3. Leftsmash

    Leftsmash Guest

    Hell no, Iron chin or not father time was already catching up well before 40.
     
  4. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    A better question is, if not for Parkinsons, would he ever have lost the title to Spinks? Then again, it would likely always be something. Too many ring wars with Norton, Frazier, Shavers and Foreman.
     
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,213
    8,753
    Jul 17, 2009
    His career would still have been over by the time he got to 40 years of age. His losing fight against Larry Holmes would have been more competitive,but he was far too long in the tooth to have beaten him at that point. He may well have had enough left to outscore Trevor Berbick,but would have lost to some other top fighter.
     
  6. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    It would have been brutally ended by Tyson if he boxed for another 4 years.
     
  7. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,213
    8,753
    Jul 17, 2009


    He would have been long gone by then.
     
  8. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    So Bernard Hopkins is greater than Ali, regardless.
     
  9. BoxingFanPhil

    BoxingFanPhil Member Full Member

    330
    2
    Jan 29, 2013
    Ali didn't 'get' Parkinson's. He developed it.

    If longevity is the only mark of greatness, then Bernard Hopkins was/is greater than Ali and many, many others. A bit of a two dimensional attitude though.
     
  10. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    As two dimensional as "get' and "developed"? GTFO!
     
  11. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    Thats crazy looking at your avatar how small mike is. Its almost like he was in a catch with his size. Just slightly too big for cruiser an a tiny framed heavy.
     
  12. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    Length =/= size.

    Tommy Hearns is smaller than David Tua even with Tommy being 2 inches taller.
    I think Tommy/Tua is a very good example why length=/= size.
    And Dwigth Muhammad Qawi wasn't a featherweight either.


    Tyson was natural at 215, very stocky built, very big.
    Being short and stocky can be an advantage depending how you use your physical size, and Tyson used it incredibly well.
     
  13. Leftsmash

    Leftsmash Guest

    Ummm what?
     
  14. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
  15. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,213
    8,753
    Jul 17, 2009
    Ali may well have done what Larry Holmes did. Being carefully matched and having a 'Ray Mercer' type victory over a young,strong but limited top contender.