The Top 100 Pound for Pound All-Time Greats

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Feb 15, 2013.



  1. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,203
    16
    Jan 29, 2011
    Having Tunney 2 tiers ahead of Holyfield just seems wrong, imo.
     
  2. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,798
    10
    Oct 14, 2009
    +1
     
  3. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    84
    Apr 6, 2007
    Of course not, but then we could go back and forth about B. Leonard versus Fitzsimmons. Preference.

    My main issue with lists is the common ratings of Napoles and I. Williams; like they're clearly below Burley or H. Williams. It can be argued, I suppose, but I'm quite strongly opposed. Both, like Gavilan and Rodriguez, have an extensive list of contenders under their belts, and cannot be separated. On my list, like I said, they would typically feature around #28-#32, with Burley and H. Williams just underneath.
     
  4. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,917
    148
    Jul 30, 2006
    I can't help you with such things, simply because Ranking Lists are impossible with 100% uncertainty, that's the only accurate thing about them.

    for me it's Elite, Great and small g great where most top fighters fall into, and the important thing is, there is very little between fighters in these categories, a 'fine' line...

    Elite/Great/great.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    75,786
    15,846
    Sep 15, 2009
    B Leonard switched for Ali.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,302
    38,881
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ali stays my dude.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,302
    38,881
    Mar 21, 2007
    Maybe the two belong in the same tier.
     
  8. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    84
    Apr 6, 2007
    **** yeah. Remember, you are responsible for me moving Fitzsimmons from around #16 to #10. I'd like to persuade you to move Leonard up a bit. If in doubt, refer to this:

    Streak: 80-2-1

    Record against Hall of Famers within streak: 15-2-1

    Ted Kid Lewis 0-0-1
    Jack Britton 2-1
    Johnny Dundee 4-0
    Freddie Welsh 1-0
    Johnny Kilbane 1-0
    Lew Tendler 2-0
    Rocky Kansas 4-0
    Willie Ritchie 1-1

    Notes: one loss disqualification, one loss four rounder (avenged by knockout).
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,302
    38,881
    Mar 21, 2007
    He's an utter ******* of a fighter - but does #8 really make your eyes water?
     
  10. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    84
    Apr 6, 2007
    Yep! Leonard, in my eyes, was a true legend in the same pot as the top three, and only an early retirement prevents him from pushing one of them out.
     
    walker smith likes this.
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    75,786
    15,846
    Sep 15, 2009
    I can live with 8 I guess.

    McFarland for Williams, Williams for Hagler
    Jofre for Saddler, Saddler for Hearns
     
  12. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    84
    Apr 6, 2007
    You might get a bit closer with Benny Lynch ;)

    Another impressive statistic from Leonard is that apart from being stopped four times when he was just sixteen, nobody beat him inside the distance again until Jimmy McLarnin after Leonard was far, far removed from what he had once been. That is some two hundred (just under) bouts in a row without being stopped.
     
  13. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    563
    Nov 5, 2009
    Lose Tunney and replace with Jack Johnson. I think jack should actually be up higher but i dont know who to lose. Im not a fan of tiers cos i end up not knowing where to stop
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,435
    1,433
    Sep 7, 2008
    Floyd above Harada is some kind of sick joke as is Harada so many tiers below Jofre.
     
  15. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,917
    148
    Jul 30, 2006
    that's just one example among hundreds of why these can NEVER be right.