The Strongest Middleweigt Era and Reevaluating Boxing Dogma

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vysotsky, Feb 16, 2013.


  1. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    Aaron Wade was definitely a middleweight. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Aaron_(Tiger)_Wade
     
  2. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    The boxers you highlited all fought at MW during the following years and faced a substantial amount of the MW's from that era

    Marshall 1936-42
    Moore 1935-44
    Charles 1940-42 (faced Burley, Tunero, Yarosz, Overlin, Basora, Christoforidis)
    Conn only 1936-1937 but during those 2 years at MW he beat Y
    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,629
    27,321
    Feb 15, 2006
    You make a strong argument.

    My only counter observation would be that some of the name fighters listed, were passing through the division en route to establishing their main body of work at light heavy.
     
  4. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    yeah those fighters fought at MW and so did Len Harvey with tremendous credentials, but I rate those types at the next division as they were merely passing through as 'young' fighters and leveled off in this case at L-HW. Their wins are still valid though as are their wins and defeats at HW equally and more so give validity to their overall ranking at L-HW. You see what I mean, fighters should really only be rated at their one true weight with the other divisions as I said adding to their excellence.

    I'd love to see your list, it's nice to see someone not being mislead by todays hype and achievements alone thinking when the truth is most of the type of fighters you mention are blatantly better than the ones you set them against for examples. They deserve that honest breakdown, ALL fighters do and it also paints a more accurate understanding of Boxing History and puts fighters in more accurate placements respectfully.

    and keeping in mind too, the differences at the TOP are in most cases minimal, there are hundreds of great fighters hundreds.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    The best era imo is the late 80s-early 90s, with:

    Roy Jones
    Toney
    McCallum
    Kalambay
    Hopkins
    Benn
    Eubank
    Michael Watson
    McClellan
    Nunn
    Herol Graham
    Reggie Johnson
    Steve Collins
    Barkley
    Leonard
    Hearns
    Julian Jackson
    Duran

    You may argue Hopkins, Leonard, Hearns and Duran were not at their best in this period ofcourse
     
  6. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Middleweight's been sadly poor since 1995.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    Its a good post and fairly well rounded.

    1) I can't post my list from phone but I know that in my top 25 or whatever the following are featured.


    Freddie Steele
    Holman Williams
    Charly Burley
    Fred Apostoli
    Ken Overlin
    Lloyd Marshall
    Tony Zale
    Mickey Walker
    Marcel Thil

    And the following feature in lists from other divisions.


    Billy Conn
    Ezzard Charles
    Archie Moore
    Georgie Abrams
    Cocoa Kid

    So it is a ridiculously strong era and I reckon I agree with you ranking it so highly.

    2) I think an artificially long reign could be had due to the war years (if they fall in this time frame, I can't remember the specific years) in terms of a dominant reign though I think Hagler could manage it as I wouldn't pick many mw's to beat him and he he came through a tough schedule himself. Robinson would be a favourite over everyone on the list but as a mw he wasn't very consistent and in his prime he was a welter so a tough schedule at a higher weight could see him falter at points. Monzon was very consistent and again I think he could replicate his success in almost any era. Greb I can't say as I haven't seen his fights.

    3) I rank on a tier system. I give resume and achievement an equal rating so even though these guys have top class resumes it is difficult to measure the worth of their achievements but that definitely holds a lot of those back. Within my tier I split on h2h based first on fight results and second on the eye test.
     
  8. gentleman jim

    gentleman jim gentleman jim Full Member

    1,640
    56
    Jan 15, 2010
    Excellent posts. Makes me rethink my take on the greatest MWs of all time. Growing up in the 70's and 80's I was convinced that Hagler was the greatest MW of all time. Learning more about the greats who proceeded him made me change my thinking a bit. I still regard Hagler as top 5 in the MW hierarchy but not necessarily #1...Though that changes with the weather of course. I would like to ask Burt for his top ten MW champs of all time just to see if they match my own picks...I tend to rate fighters on a H2H basis but would like to see a more experienced fan's opinion. If you don't mind Burt.
     
  9. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    gj. as it is so difficult to choose one best MW champion H2H, to pick 10 best MWs is 10 times harder to do...But I will give it a shot.
    Harry Greb- because of his almost surreal record of fighting almost every
    12 days,and beating everyone regardless of size, style, colour in a 300 bout career, and the last 5 years with but one eye...Think how Greb would fare if he fought a little less and rested his wounds...He has to be #1.
    Bob Fitz-a MW in a heavyweights body
    Stanley Ketchel- only 2 film of him, Papke and Jack johnson ,but not 49 kos
    Ray Robinson - greater as a WW, but the Robby who kod LaMotta was tops
    Mickey Walker- a bulldog who Londeners said would beat Robinson
    Freddie Steele- for 10 years almost unbeatable until breastbone injury
    Charley Burley-an amazing fighter avoided during the 1940s
    Les Darcy- a tragic young death age 22 .Might have been a super fighter ?
    Carlos Monzon- great size for a MW.
    Kid McCoy-tricky and shrewd. Beat LHs and heavies
    Not necessarily in order..
    P.S.I included 2 non-champs Darcy and Burley as they were special.
    PPS. Of course Marvin Hagler, tough as nails and a southpaw to boot. By far best since Robinson, but never tackled LHs,which would have answered
    many questions...Jim I know I have 11 names, but who do I leave out H2H.?
     
  10. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    great list Burt, but 3 points here...

    Fitz I would say was a L-HW
    Monzon like ALL of todays fighters would have been fighting UP against the greats & great period before him, really a L-HW too.

    and Freddie Steele, YES, but not before or without Jock McAvoy - it's blows my mind they never met and Mac too fought the big boys and did better against common opponents.

    it's better to just list 50 or more of these guys because there were a ton of them and very little between them.
     
  11. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I agree its a shame they never fought but the only real common opponent they had at MW, certainly elite one, was Babe Risko. Am i missing a bunch or something?
     
  12. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    No it's Risko but Steele fought him twice and McAvoy destroyed him as well as beat 4 other Americans including the Top L-HW cum HW contender Al McCoy who fought Loe Louis and Mac too competed with honour over the full 15 with the great JHL. these are great wins and fights to say nothing of his overall career.
     
  13. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    I do factor in the quality and context of the wins when rating them and Steele and Yarosz's few losses do not diminish their achievements at all. Actually when comparing them to other ATG MW's it actually gives them an edge against some other ATG's.

    I have done a in depth comparison with all of these factors for Steele vs Hopkins and when looking at them against eachother the disparity is actually quite shocking. I'll make a thread for it soon.

    Resume vs achievements i'm not too sure what you mean by that and again if achievement essentialy means number of title defenses that can be an extremely meaningless thing at times. I would appreciate if you take a look at the Steele vs Hopkins comparison thread i will post soon and apply it to them after looking over all my information.
     
  14. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Steele beat Risko 3 times actually, 1st in a non title bout when Risko was Champ, 2nd to win the title, 3rd in title rematch.
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,174
    Sep 15, 2009
    Achievement can mean a plethora of things. for instance louis achieved a level of dominance never seen before or since. Ali achieved 3 times champion status before anyone else. Lewis achieved the feat of beating everyone he fought. Jones Jr achieved a status as one of the most gifted boxers in history. Wills achieved one of the longest runs of top contender in history. Armstrong achieved the incredible feat of being the best fw, lw and ww AT THE SAME TIME! Hopkins achieved full unification when there was an incredible 5 belts knocking about. Leonard achieved the greatest comeback in boxing history. Rocky achieved an undefeated career. Burley achieved the status of most avoided boxer in history. Tyson achieved status as the youngest champ in hw history. Benitez achieved status as youngest champ period.

    The achievements is where my personal taste comes into. Resume is a very black and white concept that's logic based and objective, by and large there isn't a huge degree os disagreements on the strength of a resume. Achievements is what makes my list mine. It's what reflects my personal opinion on the sport and gives my rankings flavour.

    Here's my MW list as of now:

    Marvin Hagler
    Carlos Monzon
    Ray Robinson
    Stan Ketchel
    Harry Greb
    Charley Burley
    Fred Apostoli
    Holman Williams
    Bernard Hopkins
    Dick Tiger
    Jake La Motta
    Bob Fitzsimmons
    Mike Gibbons
    Les Darcy
    Tiger Flowers
    Freddie Steele
    Gene Fullmer
    Bobo Olson
    Nino Benvenuti
    Micky Walker
    Sumbu Kalambay
    Emile Griffith
    Tony Zale
    Marcel Thil
    Jack N.P. Dempsey
    Billy Papke
    Tommy Ryan