Wlad versus Barbados Joe Walcott.

Never heard of no "Barbados Joe Walcott"

 

Walcott. If an old Walcott can nearly beat a young Marciano, he can beat Wlad no problem.

Jersey Joe KO3.

 

Feel proud your ruse proved you knew some obscure fighter i didn't. I cant be a winner everyday. Enjoy it.

 

Yep, a world heavyweight champion who fought Marciano and Louis can't be obscure.

 

Walcott.

 

On a serious note, I think Barbados Joe would beat Wlad. Billy Smith had a sizable height advantage over Walcott, too, and he had to resort to biting to win a decision. Wlad is too much of a sissy for that, so Walcott would beat him.

 

Dinovelvet isn't really a master of knowledge

 

Walcott was a sensational badass, but I don't know that he could win with modern rules.

Fights are too short, and Wlad has all the tools to score all the points. I don't think a fighter that small can devastate a fighter that big, and the fight isn't long enough for Barbados to really tear it down.

In his own rules, though? I don't think Wlad could go more than 12-15 rounds. And I think when he was dragged that far, the consequences would be spectacular. We're talking Brewster I gassing.

Us big guys have trouble developing THAT much stamina.

Edit: I misread his height when I looked up his stats for comparison. Egg on my face, I thought I read five-eleven. Yeah. He goes down in the first.

 

Obscure? You're a ******.

 

I never claimed to be a historian, i dont thrive to be and im far from one. You're a numbers man. You know statistics. Evidently , from other threads it hasn't advanced your understanding of the sport.....What is learnt from understanding yeras of boxing technique and ecxuting it on others will always fuel a better judgement from what you read in a book.

 

Because you know something i dont? If that makes you feel superior to me, than you have a very sad empty life my friend.