Who will be remembered as the greater fighter: Wladimir Klitschko or Riddick Bowe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by freedom2013, Feb 21, 2013.

  1. dazl1212

    dazl1212 kafir and proud Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    672
    Likes Received:
    0
    :lol:
     
  2. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    9,817
    Likes Received:
    19,075
    2000 hits over 20 years? Lol So Wlad is an average boxer you're saying? You know how many ball players get 2000 hits over a career? How many heavyweights have had 13 or more title defenses while winning Gold in the Olympics?? That's just for starters. That little analogy of yours is a nice try, but not an accurate one in this case.
     
    Rudy likes this.
  3. Irländsk

    Irländsk Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,969
    Likes Received:
    6
    Bowe ducked Lennox Lewis, had 2 wins over steroid-fueled Evan Fields, and was dominated by Andrew Golota twice. He was champion for 1 year.
    Wlad has been champ for nearly 7 years now, Bowe is not in his league.
     
  4. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    14,448
    Likes Received:
    1,029
    Not true. Wlad's beat plenty of ATG using that critera. Byrd, Peter, Ibragimov and Rahman for instance.
     
  5. miketysonko

    miketysonko Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,387
    Likes Received:
    337
    About ten times more exciting
     
  6. FloydWillnever

    FloydWillnever Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    14
    As most have said, Wladamir has had the better career (mainly down to longevity) but prime H2H - Bowe sends Klitschko to sleep.
     
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    41,855
    Likes Received:
    11,160
    Different era's though. You can't say Wlad's better because he's been champ for seven years. I mean if you think Wlad is just better overall, then that's fair enough. But I do a head to head breakdown of each of their strengths and weaknesses. I then envisage what would have happened had they fought each other. Then I envisage Wlad in the 90's boxing the same opposition as Bowe, and then vice versa, with Bowe boxing now, and facing Wlad's opposition. When I've considered all of the above, that's when I choose who I think was better.

    Wlad is a great fighter. Bowe was too when he was fit and focused. But I don't like all of this "Wlad's had more title defences, Wlad's been champ for longer etc, so he's better." It's nonsense unless you take everything else into consideration.

    Rocky Marciano went undefeated at 49-0, but you won't hear many people saying that he's the greatest heavyweight of all time. You have to look at the circumstances involved, and evaluate everything.
     
  8. Master Lewis

    Master Lewis Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really hate Waldo but this comparison is uber ridiculous. Wlad is the greater fighter without a doubt.
     
  9. Irländsk

    Irländsk Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,969
    Likes Received:
    6
    Who were these great fighters Bowe shared the ring with? Klitschko would tear through the guys on Bowe's resume.
    Bowe shamefully ducked the best fighter of his generation and he didn't fight Tyson either. Holyfield is the only guy that Klitschko would have trouble with.
    H2H Bowe loses to Klitschko as well.
     
  10. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,170
    Likes Received:
    3
    In my opinion, this is a really stupid question. Wlad is by far the better champion. Look at how many successful defenses Wlad actually has compared to Bowe.
     
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    41,855
    Likes Received:
    11,160
    I respect your opinion. Do you think then, that if both fighters fought each other at their absolute best, Wlad would win?
     
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    41,855
    Likes Received:
    11,160
    That alone doesn't mean that Wlad was a better fighter.
     
  13. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    16,735
    Likes Received:
    6
    Neither were/are great fighters?

    How disrespectful.
     
  14. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Messages:
    29,548
    Likes Received:
    14,150
    Bowe could have possibly been on the same level of respect as Klitschko but he just lacked the character.
     
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    41,855
    Likes Received:
    11,160
    I didn't say that Bowe's resume was stacked. But you're saying Bowe wasn't in his league.

    I don't think Wlad could have beaten those versions of Holy that Bowe did. If you think Wlad would have beat Bowe at his best had they fought, that's fair enough. I don't agree. I think Bowe boxing to his full capabilities would have been too much for Wlad. It's all about opinions, and I respect yours.

    The only problem I had with your original post, was that you said Bowe wasn't in his league, and he'd been a champ for longer. But that's just circumstances.

    Bowe's era was stronger. Do you think Wlad's stats would be the same as what they are now, if we were now in the 90's?

    Like I say, if you think Wlad was better that's fine by me. I just don't like it when people pick fighter A over fighter B, just because fighter A has been champ for longer and he's had more defences etc. You also have to take other things into consideration.