The Top 100 Pound for Pound All-Time Greats

You calling ma bird a *****, son? Just because you research the **** out of Baxing don't mean you can Bax. Careful.

 

That's me told

And yeah addie but it ain't glamorous or anything just a horrible web of deceit that I can't escape from. Wouldn't recommend it.

 

**** if I know. Newspaper decisions and all that.

He's got Walker, Tunney, Gibbons, Loughran...someone would have to check the newspaper decisions on his fights with them for the record though.

 

WTF does Bax mean? I was using 'bitches' as a collective term for 'humans born with a vagina'.

Sorry if that includes your latest flame but none of their kind are elegible for a spot on a top 100 P4P list mush.

 

Oh, yeah atsch

I guess I assumed a poster of your calibre would've already done that.

Get Manassa back in this thread, for ****s sake.

 

You assume wrong. I don't do that kind of thing. Real effort into research. I'm not even certain that 13 is the most, I just said it. I'm reasonably certain though, like, 80%.

Luf, you got that for Greb?

 

Yeah, me neither. I just remember fights and certain era's, certain weights. Just envision it as one big picture of fights and fighters going through career arcs and attaching any anecdotal material I have to the fights as I go over them again.

Stats? Dates? Venues? **** knows.

 

He could do but if Floyd had his running shoes on he'd be disciplined enough to pot shot Tito off the backfoot and win a negative decision.

If it's the Tito that went to war with young, top ranked 11 stone fighters Vargas & Reid Vs the Floyd that lost rounds to Cotto, I'd put a fair wedge on Trinidad beating the **** outta' him.

 

I got some of that stuff for some of the fighters I find most interesting, but nothing at all with the newspaper decision era. I don't know what to make of it and I'm not one of these guys who reads old newspaper reports on the fights.

Greb and Loughran go at it eleventy-eight times and only 23 of them are official decisions but somehow 24 are draws. I ain't messing with it.

 

Trinidad could have beaten the Mayweather of today. He wouldn't have beaten Mayweather of 3-4 years ago. He wouldn't have gotten close enough to land his combinations.

 

Was the best Tito inferior to the De La Hoya that Floyd faced or does he not have the jab to compete at all?

 

I'd go with the latter. Trinidad's jab wasn't a weapon. He'd need the Floyd Mayweather of the Mosley fight to show up if he wanted to land with enough regularity to force a stoppage otherwise I see him getting out-boxed horribly.

 

How would David Reid fare with Floyd? I'd say the Floyd of the Mosley fight gets destroyed

 

I'm away from my computer mate but I probably do have it, I reckon I have the info for everyone in the top 100 maybe not specifically regarding to this thread but I could deduce it from the resumes I have.

I am away from the computer though like I say and I can't recall enough from the top of my head. At some point when I'm free I'll post a few of the top 10 guys successes.

 

I've only seen Reid get ****ed up by Trinidad so I can't really comment.