He wasn't outright out-classing his opponents in those two WSB fights...surely I'm not the only one who noticed that.
The **** do you call it then? He won every round, both had standing 8 counts and Vasyl barely got touched. Against very good fighters over only 5 rounds. You don't know **** about boxing anyway, go back to getting beaten up by girls in sparring and poisoning dogs you don't like.
You can't discuss boxing w/o resorting to childish insults? I know plenty about boxing. I've been watching it since I was six. You never answered my question in the other thread, btw...what kind of shape are you in? You seem to enjoy criticizing everyone else...just thought I'd ask.
Alright lets talk about the fights then. Lomachenko having his first two fights without the headgear against top amateurs. His balance, head movement, reflexes, variety of punches, work rate, body work, defence and ring generalship was all great. Where did you see problems? Where did Lomachenko lose rounds? He treated them like sparring sessions, both opponents fought very defensive after getting hurt, they wanted to just see the end of the 5 rounds. Do you know how good you have to be to make top amateurs like that just want to survive in 5 rounds? Lomachenko wasn't even in any rush, he literally treated them as sparring sessions to adjust to the 5 rounds and no headgear. These guys he's facing are nowhere near the level of fighter that a prospect faces when he turns pro, they are far above. If you knew the first thing about boxing you'd be able to see that.
back to getting beaten up by girls and murdering dogs. It's such a shame you don't want to talk to me.
pathetic. Lomachenko is great. He will definitely be a contender but there have been plenty fighters like Audley Harrison and Jorge Linares.
No disrespect but there's no chance in hell that Lomachenko won't be more successful than those two. Lomachenko isn't just the average gifted amateur, he's arguably the greatest ever and you can see he is well developed in every aspect of boxing. If you have been following him closely you know he has the mentality and the athleticism to back up his skills as well.
It´s just that you never know. His life outside the ring can also have a inpact on his success in the ring. It´s just that you never know but he will certainly do more than Linares and Audley combined have achieved.
He's married with a child, his father is his trainer and he still has a strong passion to achieve greatness as a professional despite having 400 amateur fights and winning two olympic golds. He strikes me as very level headed person who is primarily concerned with boxing, I'd be shocked if he had any out of the ring problems.
ive seen him in the amateurs and wsb and he is impressive. his style is perfect for the pros. hes got some mike, some pac, bad arse
Of course he's great. I've said that several times over, but I don't think his first two WSB fights were outright dominance. Great performances, sure, but neither opponent looked overwhelmed at any point, which is what you'd expect someone to be in there against Lomachenko's caliber.
Lomanchenko and Usyk. I don't think I've ever wanted amateur boxing stars to turn pro this bad before....