Seems to reckon Floyd won't go down as an all time great. http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/0,,13275_8527029,00.html
I know its ridiculous. He states all the reasons why he wouldn't consider him an all time great but he fails to understand that he's too good to be tested on all the attributes he states.
He said after the Mosley fight that Mayweather's "legacy was sealed" and that "he's proved everything now" Shambles of a pundit, although I don't dislike him as a person.
He hasn't been tested because he fights has bins or people on the lower weight slide its ridiculous !!
Has a pop at Broner Has a pop at Mayweather Right, thats it, who is paying this mother****er, come on, hands up! This **** is becoming the UK's version of Larry Merchant, never giving Mayweather his fair shake. Sky need to fire his ass and take Jim Watt with him! Watt is aptly named, because that is what you find yourself saying when he commentates blatant BS and bias. Watt? Watt did you just say?
Like McCrory and have defended him in the past but **** me, you're on your own with this Glen. Absolute shite the lot of it.
What a load of crap dislike mayweather as a person but like him or hate him he is clearly up there with the greatest. When someone can step up and test him then we will see.... And whoever said he fought has beans or lower weights may a just point put cotto at light middleweight not like pacquaio at a catch weight he went and fought him at his natural weight. Castillo, juan manual Marquez to name a few... Glenn sort it out lad
Remember that Glenn could fill local sports centres and has a resume that stands alongside many neverquiteweres,so we should listen to the guy.
I read up to this part: "both fighters have felt that they were the pound-for-pound king - and probably still do -"Then checked the date of the article. Didn't bother reading further.
"I've seen more in Adrien Broner's handful of fights than in Mayweather's 43." That comment alone should result in his sacking :rofl