Vitali fought with 1 arm and still won easy. Add to that styles make fights, you should know circular logic in boxing does not work. Haye did not lose in some close competitive fight, he got hopelessly outclassed and got made to look stupid, add to that he repeated the Valuev pattern of throwing no shots and being very boring. Let him actually win a few fights before throwing title belts at him.
If Vitali was consistently fighting top quality top10 ranked contenders you would have a point, but he doesnt & you dont. Haye is far better than anyone Vitali has fought in his comeback.
Klitschko fans who aren't really boxing fans like to rewrite the rules of boxing as they go along. In their eyes, losing to the champion of the division excludes you from fighting the number 2 guy. Funny thing is, there is nothing in boxing to support this notion. Nothing at all. They are simply making it up because for some reason when a person trash talks their idols they take it personally. Fact is, there is nothing in boxing preventing a guy who lost to the Champ from fighting the number 2 guy. In fact it's quite common. I mean, Carl Froch got beaten comfortably by Andre Ward and went straight in to a fight with Lucian Bute, did he not? I tell you what, how about all you ****tards who are saying you don't deserve a fight with the division's number 2 after losing to the champ link me to your posts where you were complaining about Froch not deserving the Bute fight. I'll look forward to reading them . . . Of course there will be none. Because you're making up boxing rules as you go along because you're all a bunch a whingey little girls who are in love with two men you don't know. Klittards atsch
To answer the TS question, the actual answer is be willing to fight for a tiny amount whilst entering a ridiculous contract involving rematches and fights with other fighters belonging to the same promotional company, on that promotional companies' shows and for a smaller % of the purse.
Right, because although the Klitschkos are what everyone is watching for and not their opponent the opponent deserves more pay. The opponents get more pay then they actually draw, especially Haye who received 50% against Wladimir (ridiculous).
Haye had many chances to fight Vitali, but he ducked him for as long as he could and now when Vitali is old and slow ,haye wants to fight him. Army of british ******s actually believe Vitali is ducking Haye. Brittards are seriously brittarded.
Haye brought sky PPV, and a massive UK support.. Think that just about justifys 50-50.. That is if you take your head out of Wlads Arse for a second to look at the overall picture.
But Haye also beat the 60 year old John Ruiz! HAHAHA It took like 9 rounds too! Hardest puncher? LOL! Haye=typical Brit ****
Firstly, well done on ignoring my first post because you had absolutely nothing valid to say that could disprove it. Major congrats. Secondly, as for fighters not deserving 50:50 or less, take your head out of your heroes arse. The Haye fight was a unification fight in which he was bringing not just a title, but the majority of the money due to his own personal television deal with Sky TV. Haye was more than happy not to have any of Wlad's TV money and just stick to his own deal, but Wlad wouldn't accept that and demanded that ALL the money be put in one pot and split down the middle. Why? Because the Haye was bringing the majority of the money You need to let it go - your Demi-god muscle idol was happy with the deal and it got him his career high payday. Why are you so bitter about it? Why do you even care what people earn? If you we're actually a boxing fan with a passion for the sport and not just a fanboy of two particular fighters then all you'd care about is seeing the best matchups possible. But you don't. Apparently you care more about your beloved Klits not paying opponents good purses that they don't deserve than you so seeing good fights. Well done on that, also. The bottom line is that one of the main requirements for getting a Klitschko fight is being willing to accept as smaller slice of the pie as possible. The Klits are businessmen primarily and their main focus is making as much money as possible. They know that regardless of who they fight they will sell out an arena and millions will tune in on TV - therefore they have no real incentive to offer better deals to attract higher quality opponents, and are happy fighting people like Pianeta, Sosnowski, Charrr, Briggs. You can cry about that all you like, but them's the facts. How old are you?
If you are the best challenger in the division by a mile why would the champion be claiming you have to earn a title fight anyway, surely they should automatically WANT to fight the most skilled fighter available whether he has 'earnt it' or not?
:happy Can't believe there are people on here saying Briggs deserved a shot at Vitali more than Haye does. :-(