Catchweights: Agree or Disagree?

Now what are you on about atsch

 

You know exactly what he's on about.:roll:

 

Speaking for others now are we ol' Lancey boy.

 

I don't like kicking you when you're down, gives me no pleasure. It's much sweeter when you've built yourself up a little, credibility wise and such. See you in a bit,

 

Which is why you ran from the thread when I schooled you on Pac's sham of a welterweight run right?

Peace :hi:

 

OK I'll bite. I have no idea what post you're talking about. Bump it, I'll dress it down.

 

This has nothing to do with GBP getting money off Pac fights. Nothing at all.

 

Pac is the only one to blame on this.

 

You should probably read Hauser's article on it then.

 

I read just about all his work. That said, pac is the one to blame for money going to gbp. No one held a gun to Pac's head.

 

What you're talking about took place years before the fight. Look all 3 of us know you put forward a disingenuous claim, that DLH took that sorry way out for the money. Proven wrong. Enough with evasion tactics.

 

You clearly have NO idea what you're talking about, once again. You should read up on it and get back to me.

 

here, jackass:

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxin...ao-rips-president-obama-stance-165741476.html

n 2006, Pacquiao signed two promotional agreements, one with Top Rank and another with Golden Boy, essentially beginning the feud between the companies that exists until this day. In the litigation, Roach testified that Golden Boy President Oscar De La Hoya gave Pacquiao a suitcase filled with $250,000 as an inducement to sign with GBP. De La Hoya had met Pacquiao at Los Angeles International Airport after a flight from the Philippines as he was to begin training camp.

 

And? So a year and a half is "years" before the fight now :nut

Holds as much weight as your "Mosley was still a good opponent for Pac" argument

 

How many ways can this guy say "Uncle" See you later for real. It's been fun, I guess.