Pacquiao vs. Marquez III was not a robbery.

Ouch. Why not just change your username to Agenda? I mean, I have one too, but I don't go into threads with nothing but that.

 

Because JMM - Pac3 was much higher profile but it was still a blatent robbery.
Lara vs Williams might have been even clearer but so what? still both robberies.

 

Cool story, bro.

 

I presented evidence to the contrary. I think mine beats yours. For one, yours is anonymous. And having it beating PWill Lara in the robbery stakes is indicative of either ignorance, or bias. I'd take an opinion of an informed observer over who knows whom.

 

Exactly. It was also RING's robbery of the year. One robbery shouldn't discount another atsch

 

Funny thing is, neither of the Ring editors scored it for JMM. But there's that anonymous internet poll. Other than PWill Lara, what other robberies were on the list?

 

when it comes to the scoring of Marquez vs Pacquiao III
*******s have Pacquiao winning
Marquez fans and boxing fans and people who know how to score a fight had Marquez winning
is that just a coincidence?

 

I believe Chisora/Heleinius was on it as well. All 3 were clear robberies and since Pac/Marquez was on the biggest stage that's why they considered it the biggest one.

 

I might be a *******, but I didn't have him winning. My scores were:

Pac by 1
JMM by 1
draw

But I just gave you a link with tons of press scores, and many had it a draw, or Pac winning. A solid majority in fact. Average press score: 114-114

 

Because them people love Pacquiao
same way i saw people giving Cotto the fight against Mayweather because they hate Floyd
im not even biased against Manny but he looked terrible in that fight

 

Dude nobody had PWill winning. Tons of people had Pac winning, or a draw.

 

:rofl

Nah, just a clear Marquez win.

 

:good

 

There are far more *******s than Paultards.