How come the Pac/Marqueerz robbery was never corrected and made into a W?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anglosaxon, Mar 4, 2013.


  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    The judge who scored the fight a draw marked the 1st round a 10/7 and not a 10/6 round as he should have, this was a clear mistake and would have led to Pac winning a S/D this is a judge error that is blatantly correctable so why do people still say Marqueerz has a draw and win over Pac when Pac really has 3 wins?

    If boxing wants credibility it needs to correct decisions like this, this is potentially worse than the Bradley debacle because there was no-way to see it other than a complete error in scoring ( though that can be argued for the Bradley fight too)
     
  2. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    Shut up you fairy ******.
     
  3. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Oh look a guy half my size acting tough on a forum:lol::patsch
     
  4. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    Go back and troll in the lounge where you'll find clowns who'll actually listen, ya mutt.
     
  5. moneypaysbills

    moneypaysbills That's Mr moneypaysbills Full Member

    1,688
    5
    Apr 17, 2012
    It's a fair point, if they're willing to overturn wins to no contests then why can't they correct a result that wasn't scored fairly.

    Smokin joe why do you object to that?
     
  6. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    Why don't we just go back and change every round in boxing history that we felt a judge scored wrong? Stupid post.

    Maybe if Pacquiao didn't get his ass kicked for the remaining 11 rounds, you wouldn't be talking about scoring in the 1st.......
     
  7. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    If they're happy to overturn the 3rd fight to a Marquez win, I'd take that. The first fight was a boxing clinic by Marquez either way.
     
  8. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    How is it a stupid post, 3 knockdowns were scored only 2 counted, human error, therefore it should be overturned.:patsch

    Clearly he didn't get his ass kicked as it was a draw, 1 round vs 11 doesn't equate to a draw, Marqueerz fans are so sensitive:lol:

    The idiot **** smoking Joe would have us believe Pac didn't outland and bust up Marqueerz in fight 3 so justifies fight 1 robbery on that basis :patsch:dead
     
  9. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007
    It's a stupid post because there are literally 35097230958723 rounds that could be "corrected" throughout boxing history.

    Like I said: If Pacquiao didn't get his ass kicked for the remaining 11 rounds, there would be no reason to talk about scoring in the 1st. And yes, Pacquiao got his ass kicked the remainder of the fight.
     
  10. moneypaysbills

    moneypaysbills That's Mr moneypaysbills Full Member

    1,688
    5
    Apr 17, 2012
    This is not a subjective case of overturning every fight ever. This is just correcting the scorecard to how it should have been. It doesn't matter now anyway, Marquez settled the debate with KTFO 6
     
  11. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010


    What are your feelings on this? :think


    This content is protected




    Lucky punch, fueled by PEDs, right? :lol:

    You're an infamous troll Anglo, and usually a funny one. But I think you're just genuinely hurt that Pacquiao got KTFO this time. No other reason to be so biased towards him.
     
  12. moneypaysbills

    moneypaysbills That's Mr moneypaysbills Full Member

    1,688
    5
    Apr 17, 2012
    Do you have judges admitting they incorrectly scored these rounds based on knockdowns?

    Also don't use the word literally unless you have an actual fact, not a stupid number you made up
     
  13. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    He sure did.
     
  14. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    This content is protected

    Boxing is all about what have you done for me latley.
    (While the fighters are active)
     
  15. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    What about the rounds where a ref misses a legit KD, should we change those too???