Toney got lucky. It should been far far far more then 2,500. His fine should be the same amount that chavez got.
Toney's two failed tests occurred in two different commissions, and the second offense occurred in a fight loads smaller than Martinez-Chavez.
Correct me if am wrong, but i heard weed could be used as a diuretic. Not smoking it but used in a different way.
Thankfully scrubs like you will never see me pay that amount because you're a worthless secretary or university student at very best. :good
So first you ask whether he broke the rules in Nevada twice and then claim it's none of their business to severely punish him based on failing a drug test elsewhere. Later we both find out, thanks to another poster, that this is the second time he breaks the rules in Nevada and now you come up with this nonsense. Sorry man but you're backing up someone who failed two drug tests already, you have nothing to contribute with here but, no offense, delusion. If you break the law twice you're going to get your ass ripped for it, simple.
While I agree the fine is excessive I can totally understand why the NSAC penalized JCCjr to the extent that they did. Baby Chavez obviously thinks the rules don't apply to him and I'm sure the NSAC has heard all the noise about Jr walking out on drug tests, etc. Vegas is the biggest stage in boxing and obviously Jr's fights in Nevada commands the world's attention. Jr having thumbed his nose at the NSAC's rules not once but twice in a row, given the context, is simply unacceptable. The NSAC is basically sending the spoiled brat a message; "Take that **** back to Texas and Mexico." Can't say that I blame them. Jr needs to get his **** together...
I would pass every test except my cholesterol.. Havent tested positive for anything even when I was a weekly smoker
If Vegas suspends him for drug he can't fight in the US. It is a federal law. Professional Boxing Safety Act: ยง 6306. Review. (a) Procedures. Each boxing commission shall establish each of the following procedures: Procedures to ensure that, except as provided in subsection(b), This content is protected - (A) a recent knockout or series of consecutive losses; (B) an injury, requirement for a medical procedure, or physician denial of certification; (C) This content is protected ; or (D) the use of false aliases, or falsifying, or attempting to falsify, official identification cards or documents.
Not being licensedin the State of Nevada,I personally believe that this fine could be construed as excessive,therefor breaking the law under the charter of rights.Unless the state otherwise specifically allows exhorbitant levies for infractions,Chavez should fight this case and in my opinion win. Certainly in the State of New York,where I am licensed to practice,any first year attorney would take this case and win,in my opinion.
Even if he wins the case against the NSAC, he still has to get re-licensed. Good luck with that one, Jr.