The Top 100 Pound for Pound All-Time Greats

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Feb 15, 2013.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected


    #86 Wilfred Benitez (55-6-1)

    Wilfred Benitez was only seventeen years old when he tenderly slipped into the Puerto Rican ring to meet 4-1 favorite and champion Antonio Cervantes, lifting the WBA light-welterweight title over fifteen rounds, boxed with the earnest sincerity of youth. Benitez was arguably never better, although he would impress many times between this, the first victory of his prime in March of 1976 and his July 1983 defeat by the brawling Mustafa Hamsho up at middleweight. In between he was beaten just twice and by men who lie further up this list, Thomas Hearns and Ray Leonard. When he stepped into the ring with Leonard in November of 1979, his record stood at 38-0-1 and he was about to impress once more, albeit in defeat.

    Benitez assuaged aggression in fighters as well as anyone in boxing with a combination of direct and hurtful counterpunching and that tricky head-movement that bought him the nickname “El Radar.” “Chasing a ghost,” is how Leonard described boxing him. “He slipped one punch after another…I never missed so many punches.”

    Losing that fight and a later one to Tommy Hearns pegged Benitez as a fighter that belongs in the bottom half rather than the top half of this list, but wins against Roberto Duran, Harold Weston, Carlos Palomino and his lifting straps from light-welterweight to light-middleweight make him a lock for the lower reaches.


    [yt]wTpkKH0WCOM[/yt]
     
  2. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,547
    1,902
    Sep 9, 2011
    great writeups, i like things short and sweet

    it is unfair to nonpariel that he isn't known by his own name, i refuse to say the original before films that got remade i.e I didnt watch the original red dawn, i just watched red dawn. but its a bit late to call the hw jack dempsey 2

    top 100's are hard because the difference between no 25 and 100 is so small, but there aren't many criticisms i could make,
    is langford the no 1? he was great, but above greb srr and hank seems a bit much
     
  3. the_bigunit

    the_bigunit Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,940
    19
    Nov 12, 2012
    McGrain, these write ups are fantastic.

    Can you imagine if there's any young kids going through this list? "Who the **** are these people? This doesn't look like Bert Sugar's list at all!" :lol:
     
  4. the_bigunit

    the_bigunit Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,940
    19
    Nov 12, 2012
    On the Panama Al Brown slide:

    "An aspect of ranking fighters that i very difficult to get proper control of is the dreaded “head-to-head” equation."


    Jack Dempsey NP slide:

    5th paragraph; sans drama. ITALICThe New York Evening World is quite right;
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    Cheers gents.

    Right now, Langford is penciled in above Greb and Sugar, but I've switched Fitz and Charles which I would have deemed impossible at the start so you never know.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected


    #85 Juan Manuel Marquez (55-6-1)

    So what did Juan Manuel do to distinguish himself from Barrera and Morales? He may have spent several years chasing both but failed to get Morales into the ring with him at all, and his eventual win over Barrera, although clear, is hardly a victory over a fighter in his pomp.

    The answer, of course, is Manny Pacquiao.

    In many ways, Morales did the more impressive work by getting a clean win over the Filipino at or near his best, but the career arch of Juan Manuel is more complex. Squint just a little when you look at his stats and you will see a fighter with arguably only one legitimate loss, to the P4P #1 and much bigger Floyd Mayweather. The early career loss to Freddy Norwood is eminently arguable (I have it to Marquez) and the loss to Chris John has always perplexed me. Before anyone cared, it was seen as a clean win for John. As Marquez became more and more crucial to the perception of Manny Pacquiao’s legacy, it became a robbery. Then, when some kindly soul uploaded the full fight to YouTube, it became fashionable to deem it a clean win again. For me, Marquez won the fight top to tail and I can never find more than four rounds for John, so I have the Mexican winning out of sight despite the two legitimate deductions for low blows.

    Another myth concerning this fight is that it is the fight that “changed Marquez’s style,” that he somehow became more aggressive behind this injustice (if injustice it was). That too is inaccurate. Marquez fought very aggressively in this very match, it was in part the reason he dominated. Nevertheless it is true that at some point between his 2004 draw with Manny Pacquiao and his 2006 loss to Chris John, Marquez seemed to accept that he was going to be hit, quite a lot. A classic counterpuncher with an instinctive understanding of range this attribute never translated on defense; Marquez is leaky. On offense, he is amongst the best of his generation, arguably the best, certainly he is the most fluid combination puncher of the last decade and this has resulted in a surprising 40 stoppages in 55 victories—all the way up to welterweight.

    Perhaps this is the reason Marquez ranks higher than Barrera and Morales. He’s traveled all the way to welterweight and in one of the most stunning stoppages in recent boxing history he knocked Manny Pacquiao unconscious with a single punch. Their rivalry has been a great one and in many ways it does define Marquez despite two razor thin decision losses. For the record, I don’t feel that Pacquiao has beaten Marquez once, my cards read 3-1-0 in the Juan Manuel’s favor. The judges, of course, had a better view than I did and in the end their decision must be respected, but either way, it is Marquez that has shaken more stardust from Pacquiao than any other fighter. Taken in tandem with his longevity, devastating the #2 pound-for-pound fighter in the world nearly twenty years after his professional debut, and you can see the daylight creeping in between him and his Mexican brethren.

    And he’s not done yet.


    [yt]2p1QJ0ZEpp8[/yt]
     
  7. anj

    anj Guest

    This is The ****. :good
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected


    #84 Jake LaMotta (83-19-4)

    “I was able to convince my body that I could take it and nobody could hurt me. I might’ve got cut, stitches over my eyes. Broken nose. Broken hands. But I never really got hurt.”

    Jake LaMotta’s ability to absorb punishment is legendary and perhaps even unparalleled but it has led to an eclipse of his other fine attributes, which actually includes an outstanding jab, a crucial augmentation punch for his relentless stalking style.

    Priceless ringside-eye view footage of his famous middleweight title tilt against French idol Marcel Cerdan gives us the best insight into his fighting style as he jabs and stalks the champion back whilst dipping and slipping, searching relentlessly for the opening for his left hand, which he used liberally to head and body. LaMotta’s punches were crude in the sense that he tended to throw them wide but there is actually a certain thuggish fluidity to these shots which he pours on with the wanton abandon only a granite chin can support. Getting hit for Jake was just a part of going to the office; punches held no fear for him. Despite his apparent feather-fistedness, it made him dangerous. Nobody ever managed to make LaMotta go away. Whatever poison you fed him he was there from the first bell until the last, begging for more.

    These brutal stylings brought Jake wins over Fritzie Zivic, Tommy Bell, Bert Lytell, Jose Basora, George Costner, the great Holman Williams, Robert Villemain, Tiberio Mitri and Bob Murphy, returns that give him one of the more pleasing win resumes in the division’s history. He also beat Sugar Ray Robinson, and although the great welter and middleweight dominated the series between them it is as glittering a win as exists in boxing, Jake being the only man to beat Robinson in 130 tries.

    Prime losses to the smaller Fritzie Zivic, Cecil Hudson and Laurent Dauthuille and the one-sided drubbing he suffered at the hands of the brilliant Lloyd Marshall means ranking him higher than the eighties is a bit of a stretch, but one of the most unpleasant styles in ring history combined with a litany of middleweight and a smattering of light-heavyweight scalps make him difficult to leave out.


    [yt]aKFLrjlK6Lk[/yt]
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Shame Maurice Hope didn't get namedropped among El Radar's notable scalps...one of my favourites of his, that.
     
  10. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Scary *******.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected


    #83 Lloyd Marshall (70-25-4)

    Yes, LaMotta was hard to leave out and his daring-do was a part of that reasoning. LaMotta did what very few white contenders did without very significant managerial or promotional pressure and stepped out to take on two members of the Murderer’s Row. He beat a past-prime Holman Williams in the summer of ’46, but the fight he never should have taken was against Riffmaster-General Lloyd Marshall in April of ’44. Marshall was a guy who didn’t care too much for the sheet music; a jazz musician, if you will.

    Marshall freestyled his way to a clear points decision over the Bronx Bull after splitting his cheek, his nose and actually rocking the un-rockable middleweight in the fifth round. His left hand, an improvised instrument designed only for a drunken jam session, tore both LaMotta’s face and air of invulnerability apart. Marshall, along with Zivic and Robinson, would be the only men to beat Jake between July of ’42 and September of ’47.

    One of the great delights of the last decade has been the emerging footage of Marshall. Reading about him before seeing him we were regaled with outlandish tales of a gunslinger that threw left hooks and right from the same stance with the same lack of tells, hands low in spite of a questionable chin. The stories of his falling all the way back onto the ropes and using the bottom strand to catapult himself back into the fray (sometimes prompting startled referees into starting a count) were charming, but once playtime was over it was with a shake of the head that we dismissed the colorful ramblings of the 1940’s press. Only for it all to come magically and delightfully true when the footage stated to creep out.

    Best of all was the silent film of his losing effort against Ezzard Charles. Marshall actually beat Charles in March of ’43, the jewel in the crown of his resume which includes such notable names as Teddy Yarosz, Lou Brouillard, Charley Burley, Holman Williams, Joey Maxim, Jack Chase and Freddie Mills in addition to LaMotta. A weak chin (given the company he kept) and, perhaps, a tendency to make certain agreements with certain gentlemen regarding the outcome of certain fights, led to his losing no fewer than twenty-five duels, many of them slam-bam in his extravagant prime, and this keeps him just outside the eighty.


    [yt]MXDitbm6CRA[/yt]
     
  12. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,417
    Jul 11, 2005
    1894-08-28 The St. Louis Republic (St. Louis, MO) (page 5)
    M'AULIFFE GOT THE DECISION.
    --------
    THE REFEREE AWARDED HIM THE CONTEST AGAINST GRIFFO.
    --------
    The Spectators, However, Were About Equally Divided as to the Relative Merits of the Men, and Alternately Cheered and Jeered the Referee--It Was the Fiercest Contest New Yorkers Have Seen for Some Time.
    --------
    The Republic Bureau.
    146 Times Building.
    New York, Aug. 27.--Jack McAuliffe, the lightweight champion of the world, met young Griffo in the roped arena of the Seaside Athletic Club at Coney Island to-night, and after 10 rounds of the fiercest fighting that has been seen hereabouts in a long while, McAuliffe was awarded then decision. The spectators were about evenly divided in regard to the decision, and the referee was alternately applauded and jeered. McAuliffe was not in any fit condition for a hard fight, and Griffo made a most excellent showing. Not a great deal of money changed hands.
    As early as 8 o'clock the large amphitheater was more than three-quarters full, and several thousand people were on the outside of the building to gain admittance. Every well-known sporting man in New York and Brooklyn was present, and many familiar faces from Boston, Philadelphia, Washington and Baltimore were seen about the arena. Peter Jackson entered the building about 8:20, but the crowd did not recognize him.
    When Fred Burns stepped on the stage, about 8:30, nearly 7,000 people were in the building, and the crowd still coming. Homer Lane and Joe Ryan, two old-timers, entered the arena to wrestle, collar and elbow style, best two out of three falls. Ryan won the first and second falls and the bout after two minutes work.
    Connie Sullivan and Jack Madden, ex-amateur feather weight champion, then came on to box six rounds. At the end of the sixth round Referee Carroll decided in favor of Madden.
    After a few minutes' delay Charles Burns of Cincinnati and Al O'Brien of Philadelphia entered the ring. They battled for 10 rounds, which resulted in Burns being knocked clean out. The Philadelphian was loudly cheered as Burns was carried to his corner.
    The event of the evening was now on. Griffo was looked after by Mick Dunn of Sydney, Con Riordan of San Francisco, H. Tuthill of Saginaw and Billy Sellick. McAuliffe's interests were looked after by "Brooklyn" Jimmy Carroll, Eddie Stoddard, Jack Sheehan and Benny Murphy. Maxy Moore of the New York Athletic Club was agreed upon as referee.
    The bout was to be one of 10 rounds at catch-weights. The purse offered by the club was $2,000, of which the winner was to receive $1,500. It was said, however, that Griffo was to get $1,600, win or lose, and Mac was to get $2,500, win or lose. This could not be verified, however.
    At 10:15 there was a shout from the crowd as McAuliffe entered the ring behind Jimmy Carroll. A moment later Griffo made his appearance, accompanied by his seconds. He looked trained to the hour. McAuliffe also looked well. There was a little fat on his stomach, but his skin had a healthy look.
    The men were ordered to shake hands and a moment later time was called. McAuliffe opened matters by rushing Griffo, but his lead fell short. Griffo then let fly the left and it landed full on Mac's face. Jack smiled, but Griffo looked serious. Jack appeared very clumsy as he missed several rushes, while Griffo either countered or ducked out of harm's way. Griffo rushed the light-weight champion, landing both hands. Mac only smiled, but Griffo kept at him and more than held his own; and as time was called there was a loud cheer.
    Round Two--McAuliffe again led from the go, and landed hard with his left on Griffo's jaw. Griffo hit, but there was no steam back of his blows. Jack, smiling and careful, hit Griffo very hard twice on the body and ignored Griffo's counters. Griffo ducked and got one flush in the face.
    Round Three--Jack's left eye was red as they came to the center. Griffo crossed Jack right and left. Griffo did the most leading, but Jack landed a right-hand swing that seemed to tell, and followed with another hard one on the body. Griffo's good stand raised applause for him.
    Round Four--Jack's eye looked bad. He led and Griffo countered lightly. Griffo caught Jack with the left, and he would have fallen but for the ropes. McAuliffe led and fell short, and was met with a smash on the nose. Griffo's ducking fooled Jack, and the Australian landed again on the nose.
    Round Five--McAuliffe looked serious and Griffo landed lightly on Jack's wind. McAuliffe led again, falling short. Both did some clever work. Griffo landed left on the face and right on the wind. McAuliffe was playing for a knock-out, and took chances. Griffo was making a splendid stand and earning applause for his good work.
    Round Six--Jack started in with a rush and landed on Griffo's wind, and the Australian landed with left and right on the body. Jack aimed for the jaw, but could not land with any effect. Griffo was doing the most work. McAuliffe's mouth was bleeding as the round ended.
    Round Seven--Both came up looking fresh, and sparred for an opening. Griffo landed on the wind and neck. Griffo missed a fine chance for an upper cut. Griffo did the most work and had the best of the fighting on points, although his blows did not have much effect on McAuliffe. Griffo's condition was decidedly the best.
    Round Eight--Jack came up strong and landed twice, but Griffo got in a couple in return. Griffo again had the best of the leading, and landed a straight left-hand punch on the chin. Griffo ducked to meet a hard left-hand smash.
    Round Nine--The betting was now anything but 3 to 1 on McAuliffe. Jack rushed and was met by straight jabs. Jack landed a couple of hard swings on Griffo's wind and jaw. Both tired, with McAuliffe forcing the fighting and Griffo hugging to avoid punishment. McAuliffe's round.
    Round Ten and Last--The men shook hands and looked serious. McAuliffe forced the fighting again and landed hard. Griffo was on the defensive. Jack gave him several vicious upper cuts with right and left, Jack doing all the hitting. Griffo's blows were very weak. The round ended with McAuliffe smiling. They shook hands.
    A big portion of the crowd was very much dissatisfied with the decision, and both McAuliffe and Griffo wanted to address the spectators, but were persuaded not to. Griffo claims that he had the best of the bout and is willing to fight McAuliffe to a finish.
     
  13. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,417
    Jul 11, 2005
    There was no decision mentioned in next-day reports in Buffalo Courier, Syracuse Standard and Cleveland Plain Dealer (three different reports). According to Syracuse Standard Dempsey weighed 155 and Baker 190. Plain Dealer reported that "Dempsey had only a fair week here, and on his promise not to hurt Baker the latter consented to take a small purse and a pounding in order to fill the house."
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    What's interesting about that report is that it has the crowd "divided" which is a new one on me, but the flesh of the rbr still seems to weigh the fight to Griffo.
     
  15. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,417
    Jul 11, 2005
    1894-08-29 The Sun (New York, NY) (pages 4, 5)
    ...
    Maxwell A. Moore, New York. A. C., who filled the unenviable position of referee, feels that he is being harshly and unjustly criticized. When seen by a Sun reporter last night he was looking through his notes of the fight, and he readily consented to make the following statement:
    "In the first place I had no idea of officiating when I went down to the island, and had not the slightest intention of acting as referee until I was pressed into service at the last moment, when the management persuaded me that my refusal to act might entail a postponement and general disappointment. Those most concerned had previously failed to agree on anybody else.
    "The audience were moved to a degree which hardly admitted of fair criticism. Their sympathies were clearly with Griffo from the beginning, and this was very noticeable during the reception of the two rivals. When the men stripped for the bout and it became apparent that Griffo was much the smaller man, while a decided prejudice set in against McAuliffe when it was discovered that he had champagne in his corner.
    "During most of Griffo's ostensible leads he was merely slapping his man with the open left. McAuliffe laughed at these harmless attacks, but the audience was apparently impressed by the dash of the Australian. Nothing but clean hits count with me, and I did not attempt to keep any tally of the taps and slaps with the open glove landed by Griffo in the earlier stages of the fight. The actual, clean hits or punches scored during the contest were as follows:
    First round Griffo 13 McAuliffe 13
    Second round Griffo 14 McAuliffe 16
    Third round Griffo 15 McAuliffe 13
    Fourth round Griffo 12 McAuliffe 6
    Fifth round Griffo 14 McAuliffe 8
    Sixth round Griffo 13 McAuliffe 13
    Seventh round Griffo 19 McAuliffe 19
    Eighth round Griffo 8 McAuliffe 12
    Ninth round Griffo 8 McAuliffe 23
    Tenth round Griffo 7 McAuliffe 14
    ----
    Total Griffo 123 McAuliffe 137
    "These figures are not recorded from memory or notes taken afterward. They are scored blow for blow on small registers, one of which I carry in each hand. As each clean hit is made I touch the little cog-wheel, and the machine does the rest. This system enables me to keep my eyes on the fighters during each round, and in the intervals I transfer the points to paper and start the next round with my registers again at zero. In order to show how far this instantaneous scoring may influence opinion, I may mention the case of an operator at the ringside who telegraphed the fight on sight. He kept his eyes fixed on the fighters throughout and chronicled the result by touch, as I was doing. Part of his instantaneous message read: "Griffo still tapping, McAuliffe landing heavily on body."
    "It will be seen that I regarded the scoring as even for the first round. In the second McAuliffe showed slightly in front, but Griffo fairly equalized matters in the third, at the end of which I credited them with forty-two hits each. By this time McAuliffe had discovered that Griffo was the possessor of a very shifty head, on which it was almost impossible to land, and he accordingly changed his tactics.
    "Throughout the balance of the fight 'Mac' fought for the body, and, although he landed frequently and heavily, his work was not so well appreciated as that of Griffo, who played for the face entirely. The latter style always impressed an audience, as it generally results in a bleeding nose, puffed eye, or some other indication that the blows are effective. The distinction was particularly noticeable on Monday night. Every time Griffo landed, whether with a genuine punch or a mere tap, the onlookers applauded, while little appreciation was shown for McAuliffe's stiff body blows. I gave Griffo due credit for his fine scoring in the third, fourth, and fifth rounds. The first, sixth and seventh I regarded as even. McAuliffe's superiority was clearly apparent in the second, eighth, ninth, and last rounds, and I felt no hesitation in pronouncing him the victor.
    "During the clinches I found it was Griffo who was locked every time, and that McAuliffe was free and ready to resume as soon as I effected a break. In fact, every impartial man must admit that McAuliffe was the more aggressive, and that he showed no hesitation in leading and taking chances of any counter blows Griffo might be prepared to land. McAuliffe was stronger at the finish than in the middle of the fight. His chances certainly looked dubious during the fourth and fifth rounds, but he recovered his lost ground rapidly, and was doing all the fighting toward the end. Griffo, on the contrary, seemed content to rely on his early work and escape retaliation. He did no leading in the last three rounds, and clinched at every opportunity. Had he mixed it up to the end the result might have been different, but as it was I sincerely believe that he was outclassed and fairly beaten by McAuliffe.
    "In my opinion Griffo is a clever boxer, who thoroughly understands ring rules. He can take a grueling without wincing, and is perfectly game. He would, however, have little show with McAuliffe if the latter could be induced to train thoroughly and go into the ring prepared to do himself justice. There was much room for improvement in his condition on Monday night, although he was fitter even then than appeared to the casual observer. No sentimental or financial reasons affected my decision. My services were given, as they always have been, graciously, and it did not make the slightest difference to me which man won, provided he proved himself the better boxer on the occasion. I was rather amused to find that I was charged with escaping from the building to escape the results of my decision. All who shared my anxiety to catch the last Bay Ridge boat for New York cleared out as abruptly as I did.
    "In discussing the fight afterward with men who have been through the ropes themselves, and who thoroughly understand the science, I found little trouble in convincing them that the right man had been declared the winner. I have been identified with the game myself since 1866, and feel pretty confident that I know the value of a clean hit by this time."
    ...