Curtis Woodhouse has been robbed.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by bazza12, Mar 8, 2013.


  1. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Lost a split dec. to Shane Singleton. I had it 97-93 Curtis. Unbelievable.
     
  2. John Sitton

    John Sitton Fronting anyone of ya's! Full Member

    804
    0
    Sep 12, 2012
  3. KidJackal

    KidJackal Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,898
    4
    May 15, 2012
    Serious? Curtis seems a good lad, shame for him if true.
     
  4. DaveyboyEssexUK

    DaveyboyEssexUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,441
    2
    Jan 14, 2011
  5. John Sitton

    John Sitton Fronting anyone of ya's! Full Member

    804
    0
    Sep 12, 2012
    Agreed gutted for him, Singleton is a good operator so that would of been a really good win and pushed him on towards a British title fight.

    Curtis been on the end of another dodgy decision a while back.
     
  6. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Yep. Crolla said beforehand a lot of money had gone on Singleton this morning, to the point where bookies weren't taking bets on him anymore.

    Very strange decision, just look at the post-fight faces, it will save you from watching it. Singleton boxed back foot and did quite well every now and then, but Woodhouse won it for me with educated pressure, sound footwork, a great up-jab and a greater workrate.
     
  7. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    22
    Jan 29, 2011
    Were there many close rounds or was it really decisive?
     
  8. John Sitton

    John Sitton Fronting anyone of ya's! Full Member

    804
    0
    Sep 12, 2012
    That's very suspect that...

    I had Curtis on a UD in a prediction league, Felt he'd be to much down the straight. Pissed off..
     
  9. DeMarco

    DeMarco Active Member Full Member

    888
    0
    Sep 12, 2012
    Singleton - Woodhouse

    10-9
    10-9
    10-10
    9-10
    9-10
    9-10
    9-10
    9-10
    9-10
    9-9

    93-97 Woodhouse
     
  10. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Well I had rounds 1 and 3 for Shayne, round 6 even and round 10 even (9-9) because Curtis rightfully had a point taken off for hitting on the break.

    Between rounds 4 and 9 I thought it was pretty much all Woodhouse.

    1- 10-9 Singleton
    2- 10-9 Woodhouse
    3- 10-9 Singleton
    4- 10-9 Woodhouse
    5- 10-9 Woodhouse
    6- 10-10
    7- 10-9 Woodhouse
    8- 10-9 Woodhouse
    9- 10-9 Woodhouse
    10- 9-9

    There were some close rounds, but did Singleton win 6 rounds decisively? Absolutely not.
     
  11. Dennison

    Dennison Guru Full Member

    3,086
    1
    Oct 24, 2011
    It was closeish rounds but enough to know who won, Curtis jab was very good, I had it 96-93 or 95-94 at a push to woodhouse
     
  12. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Exact same score as me chief. Glad you agree with me re: rounds 4 through 9 all Curtis. Shows I'm not insane haha.
     
  13. pikecubic

    pikecubic Active Member Full Member

    1,014
    0
    May 8, 2012
    Terrible decision, Singleton was shite
     
  14. artful

    artful *practice makes perfect* Full Member

    4,163
    0
    May 8, 2010
    What happened in the 10th with the 9-9, was it his first warning all night?
     
  15. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    There had been nothing blatant up to that point. It was a clear hit to the body on the break though. I wasn't confused/angered by it, had no problem giving the round 9-9.