The truth is that Dwyer is very analytical. He has certain guidelines and principles that he abides by. He sticks to his analysis. I haven't seen this video. However, I know that he feels Broner doesn't have good movement and that Broner will struggle against movers. I'm pretty sure that's the reasoning behind him picking Malignaggi in this matchup.
i didnt even watch it, he said something about Broner's stance is too wide thing about boxing you cant pick a winner on age, or style's in general too much, its all about how certain boxers deal with certain styles and so much other ****, thats why he gets so many wrong i think he just analyses them in a physical way but forgets about the mental things that a boxer can go through
Yeah, that's easily debunked for anyone that follows him. An inaccurately bad rap. I've debunked it several times. He may make some truly baffling picks but he's not a racist. Edit: Also, this is ridiculous as a pick, of course. Secondary edit: If Malignaggi wins I'm going to **** bricks.
I'll check it later. Somebody should chart Dwyer's success rate in terms of wins and straddles. He often makes good points, but also often obsesses about nuances or flaws and ignores other factors.
what does say? it probably makes sense about Broner's stance being wide and him being static but this is Paulie not someone like Alexander
You gotta respect dwyer. I mean no matter how many times he picks a long shot no hope'er and loses badly he still has the balls to step right back up and with a completely straight face sell this type of bs. Anyways, as for his pick I can see his logic. But there's such a thing as levels and politics. Paulie probably isn't on the same level as a a guy like Bhop whom we just saw out manuever a poor mover. So first things first its debatable whether paulie could even pull this type of fight off. Second even if he did there's no way boxing politics would allow paulie M to be the guy that beats the next big thing. Same as they weren't going to let Castillo be the guy. Same as they weren't going to let Ponce de Leon be the guy....y'all know what I"m sayin'
if Paulie would somehow win he wouldnt get the decision but he wont win too many rounds anyway, about having Dwyer having balls i think he looks ****ing weird like a child molester, why keep making videos of predictions when your getting some wrong, why not just be a boxing writer or something
yeah how Broner's stance is too wide and he doesn't move well. And how his opponents try to bring the fight to him and don't require him to move much, but Paulie is the opposite. He also mentioned Ponce's jab was doing well vs Broner. I actually have said a lot of similar things in the past about Broner and feel his power is the great equalizer in a lot of his fights. I think Paulie is going to be a lot tougher than people think. Plus Broner's great equalizer is going to be jumping 2 divisions vs a guy who's never been knocked out cold and is tough as hell