Joe rogan haveing Bas Rutten on later today..

You are wrong on the burden of proof. It is not up to me to disprove his claims, it is up to him to prove them. He has not done this because he can not do this.

And the fact that we can't precisely pinpoint the location of a sub-atomic particle means... what? QM experiments are done daily and have been validated repeatedly with experiment and mathematics.

String Theory is also falsifiable but it is exceptionally esoteric mathematics that extremely few people would understand.

The data does not support the conclusions he was attempting to make.

 

Oh, 'he has not done this because he can not do this?' so science is all done and dusted? It's all solved. We have completed the universe and there is nothing left to discover? No, these are theories that are born of the data we have. You call tehm nonsense because you don't THINK they are right. There are many concepts that a human being cannot THINK is right, infinity for one. Time will tell, as with all theories, but nonsense? No.

 

His "theories" are nonsense because he attempts to validate them with data/experiments that do not support the conclusion he draws from them. Ergo, they are pseudoscientific nonsense.

 

So is the Higgs Boson nonsense?

 

That has what to do with the claims he was making?

 

Everything. Is the Higgs Boson nonsense?

 

Tell me what it has to do with his claims.

 

Ha ha ha.

 

Noted.

 

Come on, I'm enjoying this discussion. I wasn't laughing AT you, I just found it funny that you were reluctant to commit about the Higgs Boson as I think you suspected it to be a trap, that's all.

 

I'm not sure how you could, at all, come to this conclusion based on the question I asked. My question was clear and relevant: what does the Higgs Boson have to do with the claims he was making?

 

I thought this was an MMA forum?

:huh

 

'I am not answering that question until I know why I am being asked it' You don't see how I could conclude that this is someone suspicious of a trap? I think that the answer you give could be dependent on how you think that answer will be interpreted.

 

What does the Higgs Boson have to do with his claims?

 

Oh **** me, just humour me, please. Do you think the concept of teh Higgs Boson particle is nonsense?