Better ring IQ - Hopkins, Mayweather or Marquez?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pound4PoundG, Mar 12, 2013.


  1. RazorHandz

    RazorHandz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,507
    3
    Sep 21, 2010
    Did he look the same before and after the Floyd fight yes or no? did Cotto look the same before and after the Floyd fight? How about Hatton? I don't care how feather-fisted you think Floyd is, when he hits you over and over again by shots you don't see coming for 10 to 12 rounds it takes something out of you.
     
  2. Daruf

    Daruf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,127
    4
    Jan 7, 2006
    You are a ***** ****** and you make yourself look more idiotic with every post.
     
  3. RazorHandz

    RazorHandz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,507
    3
    Sep 21, 2010
    As expected, you didn't answer my question.
     
  4. ROACH

    ROACH Boxing Addict banned

    3,130
    1
    Sep 27, 2012
    LOL at did Cotto look the same after the Floyd fight.

    Yes, he looked the same if not better.
     
  5. Bobdigi

    Bobdigi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,622
    0
    Dec 31, 2009
    Floyd played with cotto
     
  6. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Travoris Cloud, Jean Pascal, Roy Jones's Corpse? This **** has to stop. Bernard Hopkins gets so damn overrated, its sad. If his ring IQ is SO GOOD, why couldn't he beat Jermain Taylor, 8 years ago, even once out of the 2 tries?

    Bernard Hopkins just beat a champion, and in Jean Pascal he beat a champion, but those are NOT elite fighters, not even top fighters.

    To say Bernard Hopkins is in the class of Floyd Mayweather and JMM right now, in any category of boxing, is outrageous. Ring IQ? How does he have a better Ring IQ than Floyd and JMM? Floyd barely ever even loses a round, and he has multiple styles he can and has fought in over the past years, and JMM has been the only fighter to figure out one of the best offensive fighters in this generation, Manny Pacquaio.
     
  7. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Well he's outboxed the likes of Tarver, Winky, Trinidad, and Pavlik as an "old man". Pascal was elite enough to beat Dawson. The resumes are debatable, but it's clear Hopkins uses a great deal of anticipation and craft to outsmart fighters at or near the top of their weight class without too many physical advantages, and at an age where he's not as explosive. He's done it because of his skills and Ring IQ.

    :lol:

    That was a good one.
     
  8. Nate 2011

    Nate 2011 Active Member Full Member

    962
    7
    Aug 6, 2012
    I'm going to say Mayweather by a not so wide margin but mind you I have nothing but love for all three of these guys, as fighters in the ring and mostly outside of it. Mayweather being the question mark outside of it of course.
     
  9. RazorHandz

    RazorHandz Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,507
    3
    Sep 21, 2010
    Better LMAO
     
  10. Zaryu

    Zaryu Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,985
    43
    Dec 7, 2007
    I think BHop has the highest boxing IQ, Marquez is the more exciting technician, and Floyd is the best fighter of the three.

    Nobody neutrilzes another opponents strenghts Like BHop with so little physical advantages.
     
  11. Slickstar

    Slickstar Crisp This Full Member

    7,094
    5
    Apr 27, 2011
    Marquez takes another left here a few seconds from the start of round 2

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUwdZ_SqSG0#t=3m01s

    Mayweather and Hopkins wouldn't repeat the same tactical error which caused them as dearly as a knockdown. Floyd especially makes his adjustments in real time. Marquez needed that time in the corner between rounds 1 and 2.

    Marquez is good at getting ride of the angles for his opponent's left, but he pays severely when he ****s up. Years later he got knocked down one more time by manny's left during the fourth fight. Marquez can compromise his balance when taking a left wheres Floyd is stabilized.

    Floyd can be backed up because he's comfortable behind his shoulder and boxing off the ropes. A few opponents took advantage of this aspect of his style and had some success.

    Floyd figured out how to win a comfortable decision despite Oscar's features that troubled Floyd's style. When Marquez was faced with a taller and longer man with a nice jab he couldn't figure out how to win a single round.

    Did you just say Hopkins ring IQ is below Marquez and not in the league of Floyd's? Seriously wtf
     
  12. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    Hopkins. His physical skills have almost completely eroded in comparison to his prime, but his mind and skill set still allow him to compete at a championship level. I don't see either Marquez nor Mayweather able to thrive at such a high level once their physical attributes waste away.
     
  13. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    ROFLMAO I have never heard someone refer to a boxer as being elite enough. That **** is hilarious. I'm gonna start using that.

    And a little FYI, a boxer is either elite or he isn't. There is no in-between.:good
     
  14. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    my faith has been restored a little bit by this thread.

    by Marquez only having a handful of votes. his ring IQ isn't that good at all. people make too much of the Pac fights. he's his bogey man, nothing more. against the rest of his opponents, Marquez struggled badly with a lot of them.

    Floyd has a high IQ, but it doesn't match the all round IQ of hopkins.
     
  15. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    Hopkins has forgotten more about boxing than the other two know, combined.

    Marquez is second in tactics, but not as good as Floyd at making midfight changes.