--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This content is protected Timothy Bradley vs Ruslan Provodnikov, who wins? Remember Bradley was floored twice by Holt who was beaten in his next fight and only had a NC with Campbell. Provodnikov has as well as fighting in his native Russia also fought in America several times and once in China, so has no fear of travelling either So who wins? I asked who people thought would win, as I saw a close fight that could go either way. The backlash the thread took is here for all to see, but it shows I knew what I was talking about. My score of the fight R1. Provodnikov 10/9 R2. Provodnikov 10/9 R3. Bradley 10/9 R4. Bradley 10/9 R5. Bradley 10/9 R6. Provodnikov 10/9 R7. Bradley 10/9 R8. Bradley 10/9 R9. Bradley 10/9 R10. Bradley 10/9 R11. Provodnikov 10/9 R12. Provodnikov 10/8 I think the first round should possibly have been scored a 10/8 to Provodnikov, but scored it as a 10/9 for arguement sake. Making Bradley a 114/113 winner. A draw would have been a fair result as the first round and possibly the second could have been called 10/8 rounds Now lets look at what the posters had to say when I asked how they thought this fight would go, below. Extracts from quotes of theirs have been taken below ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Rayhogan - This content is protected Hendo - This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Ivyleague - This content is protected Pimp C - This content is protected MarvellaHogg - This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Brickhaus - This content is protected Interceptor - This content is protected This content is protected jeffjoiner - This content is protected Rudyard - This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dont think I need to say too much. The thread has spoken for itself :happy:hi::good Thanks PBFred, its taken nearly 3 years for this post to show the fanboys up, and here it is pwning them as I type. I tried to explain it was an even fight
I never called a winner, I asked who you thought would win because I could see a close tough fight with Provodnikovs punch and Bradley going down and and hurt before, and as it turned out, I was right again. Stick around Dork888, as you can see I dont mind laying it on the line, and here I was just under 3 years ago telling the blinkered fanboys. I expect you will still not listen, but deep down will now look at my threads with a far greater interest
You're a legend in your own mind. You want credit for saying a fight would be close, and now you want a cookie? You're a joke on Esb, and that's all you'll ever be. Biggest boxrec warrior of the century.
Failey "lays it on the line", and gets humiliated 98% of the time. Yet pulls up threads from 3 years ago to try and salvage some credibility. That just goes to show what kind of loser you are and how often you're wrong.
I dont need a cookie thanks. The satisfaction of watching you dig a deeper hole for yourself is more amusing. This thread looks a joke doesnt it atsch. I think the jokes on all the posters who called it a mismatch show me this 98% humiliation I am supposed to suffer. It normally is something like I make a thread, like the one we are on now, posters attack the comment, calling that humiliation and then this is what happens. Like you they have to swallow a large bit piece humble pie. My credibility looks further enhanced by this thread. Show me where I have been wrong so many times and I will show you where I have been right and we will see if it is this 98% that you claim. Also lets see these against the grain predictions of yours
I'm sorry, I'm waiting for you to find a quote with me saying anything about this fight. I'll give you some time to find one.... Anyway... You can't show me "all the times you were right". That's a myth you've created in your own mind. I'm not digging a hole for myself, cause I made no prediction for this fight. But it's just hilarious, that you FINALLY get to gloat over a few posters who were saying it was a mismatch, and now all of a sudden you're "vindicated". Failey, you're truly your own biggest fan.
Its rife on here LuckyLuke. You will have to give me your expert insight on how you see the Cleverly/Krasniqi fight
Although i had already seen Prov a couple of times, i've gotta admit i thought the only outcome was a clear Bradley victory with a chance of Bradley winning via tko/cuts due to Provodnikov's paper skin.
You're an idiot. Even in the threads you linked. Froch vs. Abraham, most thought it was 50/50. Martinez vs. Williams, most thought Martinez would win. Bradley vs. Provodnikov, all you said was it was a 50/50 fight. This is the sage of ESB? This is supposed to be the cacoffiny of evidence? Failey, you're showing that you take too much pride in being right "sometimes". That's really pathetic. A broken clock is still right twice a day = Sums you up pretty nicely.
Very honest Cletis. So many call it after the fight, but you are an honest poster. I tried to say over two and a half years ago that it would be a good match up