...I doubt this fight will happen, but if it did happen for July of this year, who would you pick to win? This time last year I would have said Haye by KO as he is too fast and athletic for Fury, but Fury has improved tremendously from the Chisora fight to the Johnson fight. IMO Fury is the second best Heavyweight on the planet, and with a bit more experience he could be THEE best. But back to the question, David Haye Vs Tyson Fury, who wins??
All HWs can be put away with that one big punch so Fury could do it, of course he could. BUT, Haye could do it easier, because he's just better - the problem is though the height and the reach of the S-HW vs the coventional HW Haye... there really has to be a S-HW division.
No! The heavyweight division is 200 pounds and above and always will be. Making another division is pointless.
Agree with PK there. I think lot of the chubby smaller HW's could if they did graft as Cunningham said get themselves down to Cruiser. And we've seen over the years the small men beat the big men. Sadly the good small guys like Tyson, Holyfield etc aren't around. Not dynamic enough IMO bar Haye but then his mentality is different to the other two mentioned..
No, making a S-HW division is necessary, and reducing ALL the rest. 12 divisions from Fly - S-HW at 225 lbs. plus, with approx 10 lbs between all divisions, it's easy done.
Haye but it would be tougher then people think Fury is number 4 in the world ATM behind wladamir haye vitali
Having a super-heavyweight division wouldn't change anything. The smaller heavyweights like Haye, Adamek, Povetkin, Chambers etc would still step up to challenge the Klitschkos because that's where the top money is and will always be. All it would do is allow another 4 average guys to parade themselves round as world champions.
Its not necessary, and it would not work. The heavyweight division has always been 200 and above, and the clashes of styles, sizes, strength and weaknesses! is the reason why it is the greatest division in the history of boxing. Shut the **** up mate.
My instinct, which is rarely wrong on these kind of matters says Fury wins after a war. Haye actually seems quite old now in comparison to Fury in every sense. This isn't like when Haye fought Valuev who was 41 and 25 stone, this is a guy who is just 3 lean stones heavier than him with all kinds of physical advantages .... And most importantly nearly 10 years younger than him ridiculous heart and anger/ testosterone levels. Haye would be foolish to take this fight. And I am a massive fan of both, but I don't see Haye winning.
Yeah forget the huge difference in power, skill and speed, Tyson is tall and angry so he wins Haye wins this however he pleases, if he wanted to he'd have Fury out of there within 3 rounds, as it is though he'd be happy winning wide on the cards. Fury doesn't even have a punchers chance here.