Marquez Lateral Movement Versus Floyd

But you happily allocate all their success to illegal drug use? Yeah, you're a real ethical hero.

:tired

Ban.

 

Nothing but hypocrites on this site. JMM is a doper and so is Manny. But they get more praise on this thread than Floyd who doesnt.

 

Find another site then.

 

You really love Mayweather don't you. Actually love him. Especially with statements like this...

This content is protected

JMM's lateral movement is stronger and used more often than Mayweather.
JMM's combination punching is better than Mayweather's.
JMM's power is better than Mayweather's.
Want me to go on?

I'm a Mayweather fan, but also a boxing fan. The people in this thread and other threads who are disagreeing with your bull**** are also Mayweather fans, SJS19 being one example.

Maybe one day you will become a fan of boxing.

 

First of all it's irrelevant you illiterate idiot.

Second, who has been able to avoid exchanges with him besides Floyd at WW?

Third, you can't win fights if you don't throw at some point. It's ****ing dumb to suggest Marquez's opponents are somehow obliging him by throwing at him. And besides Floyd, fighters hesitant to exchange have still tasted plenty of leather and have not beat him.

[yt]j_CF5yrK9xo[/yt]

[yt]UsonbzZ4Lb0[/yt]

Somebody needs to watch more boxing.

 

Can we please Ban the stupid people?


Scratch that, those people can be educated.

Can we please ban the IGNORANT people?

 

The good old, "he doesn't need to rely on it" argument. Employed by diehard fans of boxers.

 

Prime for prime PBF's lateral movement > JMM:deal

 

I'm a big JMM but this **** is ridiculous. PBF is superior to JMM end of discussion. Little things like that make PBF haters sleep better at night. It's like saying PBF has a better right hand than Hearns, stupid argument really.

 

So heres some of the points made..
JMM is a better combination puncher because he uses it more - Bogazto
He has better lateral movement because he uses it more - Bogazato
At the end of the day doesn't mean ****. Floyd is a way better combination puncher and just more accurate puncher period. His punch>>>>JMM punch. His movement>>>>>JMM movement period. Quantity does not mean quality and it for damn sure does not mean better. Majority of you are just haters. Floyd cordination alone trumps any kind of movement JMM ever dreamt of doing. Dont be mad because you know Im right. No good attribute of JMM's was a factor when he was in the ring with Floyd. He landed 2 nice overhand rights while Floyd was on the ropes, good job, Floyd toyed with him for 12 rounds and JMM was a tune up fight. Go ahead and lie to yourselves. But theyre not comparable in no way shape or form. One is a speed chess player who sacrifices pieces to win. The other guy is a chess master who hardly sacrifices pieces. Theyre just in 2 different worlds even in the same profession. Sorry to ruin your want to be act you know what youre talking about thread. But I'm an individual who's tired of this ***** **** of insignificant victories. Floyd>>JMM deal with it. And yes Floyd's lateral movement is better. Just relies on other more advanced ways of boxing, not brawling which is what JMM basically does.

 

This is why I mostly stopped posting.

 

If all else fails.....

 

When all else fails, ramble.

Look, Floyd gets consistently cornered against aggressors, Marquez rarely does. That's simply the reality. To quote one sweet science article, Mayweather's back probably touched the ropes more times in the Ortiz fight than all of JMM-Pac 3. That's lateral movement and ring generalship.

If you think Marquez only beats fighters with no D, you must not think much of Mayweather because Pacquiao is a better win than any win on Floyd's resume. Fact.

 

What you fail to realize is that PBF likes fighting off the ropes and is setting traps for guys. He takes usually takes little damage while he's there and makes most look amateurish while he's against them. He's probably the best fighter in the sport at fighting off the ropes.