Drug testing as early as '85 in Nevada-Bramble tests positive vs Mancini

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by kmac, Mar 3, 2013.


  1. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
  2. Nate 2011

    Nate 2011 Active Member Full Member

    962
    5
    Aug 6, 2012
    If I'm correct, the stimulant/drug that Bramble tested positive for in 85' following his second win over Mancini, and which he was fined for, was later confirmed to be a drug for allergies, which Bramble was said to have been suffering from just a few days before the rematch.
     
  3. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,791
    11,396
    Aug 22, 2004
    I know the Miami boxing commission (maybe it was on a state level, I don't know) under whose jurisdiction the first Pryor-Arguello fight was held, was taken to task at the time for not administering the post-fight drug tests that would have either confirmed Pryor's guilt or innocence in the infamous "black bottle" scandal. Ergo, tests were being performed back in 1982 at least.

    Or were supposed to.
     
  4. Nate 2011

    Nate 2011 Active Member Full Member

    962
    5
    Aug 6, 2012
    And just to step out of the drug testing scenario piece for a moment and while we're on the subject of Bramble-ManciniII, did anybody know that rematch between those two fighters, which was carried live on HBO, was the absolute first time that HBO's computer/compubox stats in examining punches thrown and punches landed was ever used for a live main event!
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
  6. Rex Tickard

    Rex Tickard Active Member Full Member

    818
    14
    Dec 29, 2012
    IIRC, they did actually perform the test, but the results were somehow "lost."