Poor AA Steiglitz ****ed that eye up big time. As for GG v prime Mundine at SMW I think GG SD. Mundine would nick some rounds and avoid GG's bombs but his timidness would cost him the fight.
Even the best get hit, it's how you take those hits is what matters. Neither one of us will convince the other here, so we'll agree to disagree. Sure, while he's fighting cans. Most fighters look exceptional when fighting someone several orders below them. Lets see how he goes against a live opponent. All 3 smash him IMO. Kessler will beat Froch again too. :deal Spot on again KKKel. :good
I seriously think people are missing what the heading says......PRIME Kessler and Green can be considered two of the biggest punchers in the SMW division last 10-15yrs.... and Mundine (Prime) went the distance. I'm no Mundine fan but give the guy some credit at 168lbs in his prime fella's
yep fair point, i still thing golovkin would beat him by outworking him and being the agressor however.
What? :huh I love Mandy brah. :thumbsup Nah **** that, still can't stand the wanker :yep, but hey, I'm not stupid, I'm well aware he was a very slick boxer at his best. I always give credit where credit is due, no matter how much I hate to say it. And GGG is so overrated it's not funny. I mean he may well be very good, but how the hell can anyone tell with the level of opposition he's faced? :huh
This is about a prime Mundine vs Golovkin, not another thread for you for you to troll. Geale has nothing to do with this thread, so stop trying to turn it into one. Either contribute with some intelligence towards the thread subject or **** off and troll somewhere else.
I did give my prediction, your a bit to aggressive mate. My apologies if I upset you, I thought I could sneak that question in this thread while we were discussing a fellow middleweight champion as I didn't think it warranted it's own thread.
Can we compare Geale and GG in height? The reason being Mundine was closer to his prime when he beat Geale and he evaded a hell of a lot of punches in that fight. Who's shorter GG or Geale? Choc's reach in his prime (I mean get in range real fast and back out faster) could be a factor in this fight. It could be a carbon copy of the Green fight but GG might be less one dimensional than Green appeared that night.
Not upset at all. Just that you have a history I trying to derail a thread with troll posts, and this has been a good and civil thread so far, but if it's a genuine question you are asking then you'll get a genuine answer. Fighters develop a style that fit their physical attributes. Geale has amazing stamina so he fights using a high workrate with high volume punching. He used this against SS and outboxed him with little trouble, Proksa on the other hand has good reach and solid power. He is self trained I believe, so his style is very awkward and was all wrong for Sylvester. I'm sure you've heard the saying "Styles make fights". This is just another case of that and in no way does it diminish Geales win over SS. That's like saying Mayweather isn't as good as Pacquiao because he didn't KO Cotto. :good
if i was in the same room as u guys showing you some of GGG tactics on how he beats guys up and show you what i see,i would love too know your responses.. the guy is ****in freakish...watch him this weekend against the jap that went 12 rounds twice with title holders and see what he does...hint hint...the jap will try to go toe to toe with him with heavy flurries and see what GGG gives him back..look out for the over hand left....