List all the fighters you'd favor over Prime Calzaghe 168-175

Any guy with a pulse. Any girl who weighs over 90 pounds.
Any manager from a fast food place on planet earth. a bank teller. the elephant man.
****** Bieber. Keith Urban.Bob Dylan.Jay Leno. a cardboard cutout of Barney the dinosaur etc


Joe Calslappy,the coward from Whaled,the joke on boxing,the bum who didnt matter

 

Bob would have been 61/62 when Joe was prime. Would Joe have faced him then, or would he have waited while Bob was a little older?

This is a joke by the way, if any huge fans of Joe are reading this.

 

No, Tarver is a big strong southpaw, if a shot Jones can drop Joe I reckon Tarver would to, only difference is Tarver finish's the job...

 

:shock: Bloody hell man! That's worse than Vitali's fanboys over TKO6! And you were seriously trying to claim no one was bitter about Calzaghe in a different thread?

 

Calzaghe's style played into Toney's hands. He would've gotten eaten up and possibly stopped.

 

Roy Jones Jr
James Toney
Bernard Hopkins
Michael Spinks
Bob Foster
Ezzard Charles
Archie Moore
Harold Johnson
Billy Conn
Tommy Loughran
Matthew Saad Muhammad
Dwight Muhammad Qawi
Eddie Mustafa Muhammad
John Conteh
Victor Galindez
Yaqui Lopez

A lot more at 175, also.

 

Tarver is so over rated it is ridiculous... Is this because he best a weight drained past his prime jones and looked average in doing so?

Joe was faster and his best trait was he could adapt to any situation. He would win around 8-4 vs tarver.

 

If by "bitter" you mean we are angry that a crooked,talentless coward receives unwarranted praise from unintelligent fans than yes we are bitter. Joe's resume is extremely poor. And all of his exploits are well documented in his autobiography or by his own on the record statements.

 

Prime roy at 168
Andre Ward
Current Froch
James Toney at 168

 

:good

 

A lot of people seem very bitter about Calzaghe's success. I think you need to try and relax and move on.

 

By bitter I mean displaying excessive hatred and spewing over the top levels of bile at the slightest mention of Calzaghe's name - which is what you have done.

It's one thing to present the argument that Calzaghe accomplished very little, that he wasn't a great fighter and that some overrate him considering his resume is thin, its another altogether to go out of your way to attack him and anyone who might have anything positive to say about him just because you dont like the way he handled his career.

 

So, whats the point of your thread loser?

 

Right? there dicks seemed to be shiveled up over it.
The posts on here is response to the OP's question is
unreal. FFS?!