A gamed and motivated Charr would be Hayes second best winatsch. I watched Charr for a long time and he is a ****ing beast in the ring! Beating Charr wont be easy! Charr was also very unlucky to get stopped by this cut! Without his corner even had no chance to look at the cut! And do you know why they pulled Charr out that fast? Because they saw that it would be hard work for Vitali to get Charr out of the ring! Some people here just have no clue... no clue at all!
So what just because he had a competitive against Chisora this does not mean that Vitali is done. Although I have to say that Vitali also not looked good against Charr! Charr was able to hit Vitali many times. Wich normally does not happen to Vitali because he moves very well around the ring and has great reflexes. It could be true that Vitali is over his hill but thats not because the Chisora fight thats because he is getting old.
Are you on the ****ing sherbets or something? Charr has never fought anybody, he's not a legit top 10 heavyweight. His ranking with the WBC is paper, hence why no one else even has him in their top 20. He was just another bum cherry-picked by the Klitschkos for a routine defence, the only difference being that he has a bit of a personality. Haye crushing him would mean nothing in terms of respect from fans and fellow fighters.
Are you? If you cant see a good boxer it is not my problem! Fact is Haye never fought a great Heavyweight! The first time he faced one he faild badly! And this is a fact! It says it all when his best win was against a ****ing paper Champ like Valuev! And his other two title fight were against Ruiz and Audley! The only impressiv thing was the KO victory against Chisora! Not because he beat Chisora (because beating him is not hard) because he KOed him. Charr would be better than most heavyweights fighters on Hayes legacy! If you cant see that it is not my problem! Charr is a good fighter. And better than Ruiz, Audley or Chisora. I am done here some people here just cant see the reality! Charr cant fight the best fighters! Because he just has not the money to make these fights happen! He has to wait until a fighter like Haye gives him the chance! Thats why he faced no serious contender right now!
It is really funny that there are HAye fans who would complain abaout Haye facing Charr although Charr would be better than most fighters Haye faced in the Heavyweight division. Audley and Ruiz (AS TITLE FIGHTS) were ok. But Charr as a "ranking" fight would be not? Strange world.
Here is the Booth interview with iFilm London, you 'have' to watch the last couple of minutes, it's ****ing funny. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=f6qlTz7exfI He doesn't rule Charr out, I'd personally be dissapointed but not surprised.
Whats wrong with you people? Make objectiv arguements! Why would Charr be a bad fight for Haye? because Haye faced many much better fighters till now?atsch Make arguements! But it seems that most of you cant and then you have to start to insult people. This is pathetic! I bet most of you watched only 1 or two fights from Charr.
Why? If you are dissapointed with Charr what were you when he faced Audley and Ruiz? Haye never was a fighter who faced strong heavyweights when he dont has to. He will try to make it the easy way. And still Charr would be better than most fighters Haye faced (better than Audley, Ruiz, Chisora, Barrett) Or not? At least he is not much weaker thats SURE! Cant understand why people have to start to insult me because of this opinion.
First of all, where have I insulted you? ***** (jk!). Audley was a joke of a fight, Ruiz was what it was at the time of Haye's step up to HW. I admit that I haven't seen a great deal of Charr but some of his highlights prior to the Klit fight put me off his credibility. It wouldn't be a disgrace of a fight if i'm feeling generous but it also isn't in my top 5 realistic match-ups. We'll see soon enough.
I did not mean you. of course Haye could fight better fighters. But if you look at his heavyweight fights he faced just two good heavyweights (Valuev and Wladimir) The rest is not better, (at least not much) than Charr. Haye could face better opponents but Charr would not be bad and Ok for his first fight if you consider who Haye faced till now as a heavyweight. A motivated Charr is a good test and if he can KO him (Vitali was lucky because of that cut) he also can make a statement. Because Charr is one though ****er
This. I think he'll fight someone like Magomed Abdusalamov (who is undefeated) and then Helenius if he'll fight over here. There is little point in fighting Pulev as Haye is in a decent position already and Pulev is dangerous. Povetkin may be an option but would he fight outside of Germany?
If he wants Wlad again (which theres no chance he does) then he must fight Povetkin If he wants Vitali then it can only be Jonathan Banks. Those are the only fights that make sense in terms of getting near the mandatory spot.
Clueless. Agree. Charr is vastly under-rated on this forum, wrongly in my view. Haye Vs Charr is not the easy fight that many think it'll be for haye. Is this for real??