I'v always been a massive skeptic and critic of bellew, the thing that startled me the most was the many fans of his, who were claiming he was the most skilled boxer in the uk, and they were also claiming he'd be able to outbox tyson furyatsch, They were also claiming bellew was easily the best 175lb after barely scraping past cleverly in a fight he lost in his own backyard. The most idiotic statement i'v heard was bellews jab is one of the best in boxing:!:. I'm amazed at the level of **** that ppl were posting on this forum, you see a guy with a boy next door/ one of the lads type personality and it overshadows you're perceptions of reality. Nathan cleverly is a better fighter then tony bellew. and if they were to fight cleverly would have an easier time with him. bellews power is overrated, he's slow of hand and foot, and is one dimensional. He's almost like a journeyman
i don't know what ppl see in his boxing, he's way too basic, and his power is just overrated. He was landing clean punches on cleverly for 12 rounds and cleverly didn't look too phased at all. I'd pick brehamer to beat him.
i'm pretty sure you're the nob who a few days ago, was posting jargon about bellew brutally stopping chalimba, you seem like an imbecile now jog off, you daft ****.
This is what happens to British fighters, they look like gods until they step up to world level Same will happen to Brook
To be fair Kel is atleast a level above Bellew. Brook actually has some degree of craft, as opposed to Bellew who's idea of a Boxing master class is three jabs a round.