Larry Holmes is the greatest HW of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Nipple, Nov 7, 2012.


  1. Theron

    Theron Boxing Addict banned

    6,597
    34
    Sep 2, 2012
    He won the second
     
  2. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    What's your opinion of the Witherspoon fight? Was he not a little vulnerable to the right hand? I'm not getting the Buster Douglas analogy. They fought rather differently, to a different rhythm.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,738
    21,992
    Sep 15, 2009
    Borderline top ten.
     
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    He clearly lost the first Spinks fight, but clearly won the rematch.
     
  5. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004

    He's very similar to Douglas. Movement, busy jab, speed. Very, very similar in styles.
     
  6. rinsj

    rinsj Active Member Full Member

    780
    348
    May 19, 2007
    Here's another fun filled fact, Larry Holmes did twice what Mike Tyson couldn't do once...stop James 'Bonecrusher' Smith.
     
  7. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,608
    2,499
    Nov 6, 2011
    :deal. In terms of h2h I think he may just well beat the most heavyweights that weren't great, like it's already been mentioned, possibly the most well rounded heavyweight of all time, but I just don't see him being able to overcome stylistic problems easily at all. When you start throwing the likes of Tyson, Lewis, Louis, Ali, Marciano etc against him, I dont think he does half as good as most expect him to do.
     
  8. swilson120

    swilson120 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,009
    0
    May 6, 2009
  9. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    I'm sure Holmes still holds the record of 9 consecutive stoppages as heavyweight champion.
     
  10. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,608
    2,499
    Nov 6, 2011
    Maybe because Louis trumps Holmes in his two best categories. Dominance it isn't even a question, Louis beat virtually everyone in his era and the majority of the time it was by KO for what it's worth and had more consecutive title defences. Even if you want to argue that it wasn't Holmes fault for not unifying (he had the chance, but took the extra money) you can't give him any credit for that, only discredit him less.

    Also if you want to get into H2H I think Louis may well beat Holmes in a H2H match up.
     
  11. marcianofrazier

    marcianofrazier Member Full Member

    130
    1
    Mar 28, 2013
  12. Theron

    Theron Boxing Addict banned

    6,597
    34
    Sep 2, 2012
    :huh:huh:huh

    What does your top ten look like?
     
  13. Ducktali

    Ducktali Guest

    Is this fact?

    Bert Sugar got Lewis just inside the top 20?



    I'm torn between saying what I really feel and not wanting to offend since he's dead.

    I get really ****ing emotional whenever Lennox gets unfairly treated.

    I hate Bert Sugar now.
     
  14. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    Maybe it's the fairest to rank the heavyweights based on the ranked opponents they beat.
    You can only beat the men that were avaible then.

    Marciano, Louis and Ali are all extremely close then.
    Ali would maybe even be third if you take away some wins that are regarded as robberies.

    But ratings do get strange then, Ezzard Charles and Archie Moore would be top 10 heavyweights

    Oh well, no kind of rating is perfect
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,599
    27,271
    Feb 15, 2006
    Rating fighters by their ranked oponents does produce some strange results.

    Louis and Ali are obviously in a class by themselves, with Larry Holmes as a clear third.

    Jack Sharkey of all people is surprisingly high.