Such bile and bias in this thread. A controversial decision goes against Anthony and everybody is desperate to justify it, why?! He will take it out on the next person he fights before turning the lights out on Geale later this year.
Daniel Geale dominated from start to finish. There's nothing controversial about the guy who dominated the fight getting the decision.
I think you saw what you wanted to see which is fine. You are entitled to your opinion and to close your eyes to the controversy.
Like anyone with the ability to score a fight I saw it very much like these guys did >>> judge: Charlie Lucas 116-112 | judge: Ray Reed 117-111 | judge: Tony Marretta 117-111 (all for Geale).
Ive got an idea about this upcoming announcement... Anthony Mundine Vs Roy Jones Jr In Antarctica.... With Penguins looking on..
Yes, you have to give him props for helping get media coverage and the average aussie interested in boxing but sadly he hasn't used that to put on great shows/cards that showcase the best Australian boxers for the most part.
what a dickhead starts a mundine thread and turns it into a dominant champion geale appreciation thread
Mundine is the biggest draw so luckily he can get himself back to the top by luring a name fighter to fight him. Then he can clear up this Geale controversy.
That Mundine carried on like a spoiled brat after the fight? Yes, that did get plenty of coverage, and nobody believed a word he said. He got schooled, as shown by the scorecards and all the match reports :good