Bradley rated #7 WW by ring magazine

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by seansanashee, Apr 2, 2013.


  1. seansanashee

    seansanashee Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,658
    568
    Nov 27, 2010
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,451
    6,112
    Oct 5, 2009
    very stupid, Bradley is top 4

    Probably because he is Top Rank
     
  3. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    Bradley top wins are mostly at 140 lbs, Alexander, Holt, Peterson, Vasquez and Witter wins are the reason Bradley is rated top ten P4P ( Pacquiao is his best win but I felt he lost that.)

    I still think he should be rated ahead of Malignaggi and Brook though.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004

    P4P and Division rankings are two entirely different animals. Doesn't work how you think it does.
     
  5. sbbigmike

    sbbigmike Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,847
    0
    Apr 15, 2010
    Paulie Malinaggi is higher than him, lol at this GB ****ery

    This content is protected
     
  6. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    TBH if Tim is in the Top ten P4P yet are behind guys in ratings who are not on that P4P list something is clearly wrong......

    But look at who promotes those guys that are rated above Tim.... just goes to show you that these ratings by Ring are no longer worth a damn.
     
  7. Changfoo

    Changfoo Guest

    That's because Ring Magazine is owned by Oscarsexual and Tim Bradley is with Top Rank and Oscarsexual is mad and yea he is mad.
     
  8. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Ole' Fishnets must be back on the white powder. Bradley is CLEARLY in the top 3 @ 147. The Ring Mag is a J O K E...
     
  9. uberstar

    uberstar Guest

    the alphabet ratings are still FAR FAR worse
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    3
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not really. Not when part of Tim's P4P rankings is based on his work at 140 as well.
     
  11. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things.

    49,849
    39,159
    Apr 17, 2011
    Ranked higher :deal
    Yall need to pipe down for a second.
    Malignaggi has been at WW for a longer period of time and has more wins there.
    Technically speacing, Senchenko is a better win at WW than any that Bradley has had. Bradley has only beaten one WW and that was Abregu in 2010.
    Provodnikov just moved up from 140 and he wasn´t even ranked there :tong

    Just because Bradley is better does not mean he deserves to be ranked ahead of Malignaggi when he does not hold a deserving win.
     
  12. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    24,436
    28,366
    Feb 10, 2011
    Come on, we all know that Ring can't be trusted anymore.

    It's no longer an objective magazine. It's a mouth piece for Golden Boy to promote their fighters. At the P4P list and the basic rankings. They're using it manipulate the public.
     
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    This.

    Bradley should be ranked at WW behind: Mayweather, Marquez, Guerrero, Pacquiao, Brook, Malignaggi, and perhaps even Alexander when you really think about it.
     
  14. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things.

    49,849
    39,159
    Apr 17, 2011
    They have borderline solid rankings in induvidual divisions.
     
  15. Underground

    Underground New Member Full Member

    12
    0
    Nov 6, 2012
    Don't think Brook should be as highly rated as he is. Not just yet anyway. Really hasn't fought anyone of real note. Matthew Hatton and just barely scraping past Jones are his best wins, not much to write home about.