I have yet to see any solid argument on why Jones is a better fighter/better resume. Just a bunch of your opinions.
How about the fact that Floyd more big names + solid opponents on his resume? We can go down one by one if you want. It will take a long time but in the end, you will lose the debate.
Third time, i've ask you to quote me. Where i lied. Your "crebility" is on the line. I've already proved that you are blind that is clear as day.
Child please. Lets go ahead and do it. Lets name them and when they fought them as well and compare. I have named several already and still waiting on you to come on with it.
I love to debate. And you are right, is a waste of time bc these fools will never admit they are wrong. I got time to kill at my work though so i don't really mind.
How are we wrong about who has the better resume when you won't even give reason as to why Floyd's is better? atsch
ONe of my first post i've list their big names then their solid opponents. Not to mention that Jones' resume have losses as well while FLoyd doesn't. So looks to me i'm already ahead in my debate.
While Jones' wins over Hopkins and Toney may be better individually than anything Mayweather has, the majority of the next several "best fights" between the two come from Mayweathers' resume.
Resume has nothing to do with losses or wins but who is on them. Nice try Roy has a win over a top heavyweight that out weighed him by 25 to 30 lbs. Floyd want even fight Sergio at 154. I am a big Floyd fan but that is a fact. Sergio may be too big for Floyd but Ruiz was for Roy and Roy took it on.