Mikkel Kessler vs. Carl Froch II

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Mar 4, 2013.


  1. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Hopefully Froch TKO's him in 8 or less .
     
  2. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    i'm tipping froch to even the head to head. i'm picking KO too
     
  3. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
  4. 168 lbs

    168 lbs Guest

    Froch 66/33% favourite. Wow!
     
  5. 168 lbs

    168 lbs Guest

  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,853
    81,821
    Nov 30, 2006
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,853
    81,821
    Nov 30, 2006
    George Groves - who has been calling Froch out - has been added to the undercard. :bbb
     
  8. 'el nino'

    'el nino' Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    1
    Nov 5, 2009
    Do you realise you have averaged 50 posts a day for the past six and a half years.

    :patsch:patsch:patsch
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,853
    81,821
    Nov 30, 2006
    No, I haven't.
     
  10. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    That's somewhat surprises so many people think that Froch, could actually knock out iron chinned Kessler. Especially since when Kessler, actually boxed he picked off Carl pretty easily in the middle rounds. Carl, was only about two shots from being knocked out himself in the 8th round of that fight.
     
  11. 'el nino'

    'el nino' Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    1
    Nov 5, 2009
    Round figures April 2013 - nov 2006 = 6.5 years

    6.5 x 365 = 2376

    120,000 posts / 2376 = 51
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,853
    81,821
    Nov 30, 2006

    As of November 2011, I had 70k. That means I averaged 38 posts a day in my first 5 years on here.

    ...but even there, it doesn't mean I averaged 38 a day for the entire five years. It's skewed.

    As of summer 2010, I was averaging 25 a day with a post count in the low-mid thirty thousands.

    So there was a huge spike in activity from 2010 through 2011 (which is when I started doing RBRs) and an even bigger spike from late 2011 to the present. (during much of which I've been a moderator and the site's only vBookie...and still doing RBRs)

    From late 2006 through mid 2010, it was 25 a day. From mid 2010 through late 2011, 73 a day. Since 2011, 100+ a day.

    It all does average out to 50 a day, but the statement "you have averaged 50 posts a day for the past six and a half years" is inaccurate as phrased. I've only averaged fifty or more for a little over a year.
     
  13. 'el nino'

    'el nino' Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    1
    Nov 5, 2009
    A lot of effort to reaffirm my point

    A linear average is as stated linear

    In summary: what else do you do apart from being glued to this forum
     
  14. 'el nino'

    'el nino' Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    1
    Nov 5, 2009