RJJ record V FMJ record

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pound4PoundG, Apr 3, 2013.


  1. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Nobody said that when didn't count. It was a good win. I just personally think Roy's win over Ruiz was better and when you really break it down it was. You don't get 175lb guys going up fighting 230 lb top 5 ranked and championship level heavyweights every day or year. You are to busy looking at Oscar's name rather than looking at the details and breaking it down to compare.
     
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch Why is this to me moron? I don't go along with the line of thinking that AGE is the determining factor of the quality of a fighter, since too many have been able to fight at a high level to 40. Nice try....


    But hey, if YOU think this way, you have yourself a nice, convenient excuse to use if Floyd loses. :roll:
     
  3. steviebruno

    steviebruno ESB NYC Delegate banned Full Member

    3,967
    1,064
    Dec 1, 2012
    You cannot go by actual pounds in a discussion like this. You'd have to calculate the percentage of weight gained in relation to a fighter's original weight.

    A fighter moving up from 130 to 160, for example, is a much greater jump than a fighter moving up from 170 to 200.

    That's why the weights classes are so close together in the lower weights.
     
  4. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    BLAH BLAH BLAH. Lance the biggest troll ***** on ESB.
    Anyone who dogs Floyd is his bff and wants to blow them.
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    :huh Is that why there are more fighters who have held mulitple division titles from 130 - 160 then who have from 170 - 200? :huh
     
  6. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007

    And what details do you want to compare?

    The fact that Oscar is a better fighter, with a better resume, is ranked num1 at 154lbs at the time and fought Floyd when he was debuting 154 in a tiny ring, big gloves?

    To Jones at a 20lb disadvantage against a solid heavyweight?

    Not to mention that Jones had a 20lbs advantage over BHOP, which i don't see you crying about.
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004

    Look moron...you asked me an irrelevant question based on a flawed premise. :lol: Don't get pissy that I catch on to things quicker then a dim witted poster like you takes months to catch up on.
     
  8. steviebruno

    steviebruno ESB NYC Delegate banned Full Member

    3,967
    1,064
    Dec 1, 2012
    There are more divisions to win titles in. Geez.

    130, 135, 140, 147, 154, 160.

    vs.

    168, 175, 200 (cruiser or small heavy)
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    DLH was ranked #1 at 154 when Floyd fought him? According to who? You? :patsch

    DLH had LOST his last fight at 154 before moving to 160 for two fights. Then when came down, beat Mayorga, who had done NOTHINg of note at 154 himself.

    And, to you, that made DLh #1 at 154. :patsch
     
  10. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Go back sucking floyd haters dick thats all your here for anyways. Although Mr and like father aren't floyd haters. i know that.
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well duh. :lol:

    Look man, I'm talking about fighters who have held multiple titles in each span. If you think it's easier to move from 170 to 200 and pick up titles, care to explain why there aren't many guys who have held titles from SprMw to CW?
     
  12. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Then who was?
     
  13. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
    I think Floyd's resume is alot more consistant in talent and is deeper....

    But you have to give Roy a considerable nod for Toney and Bhop plus the Heavyweight feat....However his best win is clearly Toney...who he dominated.....the Toney win was and still is just impressive....not a win on Floyd's resume to compare....no matter how you cut it.
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004

    :lol: Again...it was you who asked a stupid question. Don't get pissy I just called you out on it. And now you'll just reply with garbage like this, since you can't come back with anything relvent. ****... :patsch

    Hell, You choose to reply to this **** rather then continue the discussion on Ruiz' worth as a HW titlist. It's called defelction....you're not that clever..
     
  15. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
    Spinks i believe at the time.....