The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Stay on topic, I'm not reading that drivel.

Mayweather easily handled Marquez. They are all around the same size, Floyd is leaner but Pac and Marquez are more compact :deal

 

I've never defended VADA or USADA, so yeah it should be handled on a unbiased state level. Donaire said his opponent didn't have to drug test but than said he would pull out if Rigo didn't test, why? Cause no one wants to fight the best while on roids. Why do you think people get so mad when *******s say JMM took PEDs? Because Manny **** on testing so bad that even if JMM was roiding it's okay cause Manny picked that life by not testing. Also I'm not saying Manny or JMM ever did ****, I dislike him for catch weights that's it, but when Manny fans **** on drug testing they can't have it back, they can't say JMM and Peterson have to test but Manny doesn't. Really I don't think this is hard.

 

It bugs the **** out of you?

Since when did Floyd ASK?

Manny was PUBLICLY SLANDERED AND HAD TO SUE FOR DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER!

There's a ****ing WORLD of difference!

See post 299.

 

See post 299.

 

I don't even speak on the lawsuit, in America anyone can sue anyone and innocent people settle it proves nothing. No I don't understand the argument that says Floyd shouldn't ask a ATG to take a drug test, because when people thought Peterson failed a drug test against Holt people went crazy on here, so my take away has to be the people on here are hypocrites.

 

lance armstrong sued as well i guess that meant he was innocent hahaha

 

Ha!

 

there wouldnt have been slanderin if he just sucked it up and took the little blood samples haha

 

Read my post you replied to - how Mayweather went about it and how Donaire went about it is completely different. Donaire is already subjecting himself to Olympic drug testing, so has the right to ask for it. Mayweather wasn't subjecting himself to anything and hadn't demanded it from anyone and out of the blue came out with it as a demand against Pacquiao only - there's a big difference in both cases...

One is genuinely showing the world he's clean and accepts it, the other used it to discredit another boxer and as a pure PR exercise which he has now had to follow through with - but still Mayweather only tests 2 months prior to a fight, not for the whole year of inactivity in which he is still working out hard

 

Speaking of drivel??? What I said is a valid response to what someone said about Pacquiao fighting a lightweight when he's fighting a guy his size. So I am not digressing, I'm responding to another silly comment which you funnily enough didn't have a problem with it being off topic...

Mayweather is taller, has a bigger reach and is naturally bigger - just go check the pictures of him standing next to Marquez and he still doesn't respect the catchweight...
"Leaner", "more compact" LOL..speaking of drivel :roll:

 

When I was banned from Left Hook the ******* said the court case proved Pacquiao was innocent, this was before Lance was exposed, Lance won people's life savings in court cases, it's just despicable how they act

 

yep

 

Ha! People are gonna argue about this for the next 50 years!

 

What Lance did was outrageous! But as the years have passed, there was more people coming forward giving statements etc, and he had no where to run. USADA were chasing him for years.

There is no evidence whatsoever that Manny has taken anything.

The rumours came from Floyd Snr, and he was taken to court.

In court, he'd got NO evidence, and had to back down and apologise.

He then gave various interviews to guys like Percy Crawford at Fight Hype, saying things like "Well, I never said that he was definitely on something!"

He made a complete and utter fool of himself.

The cases of Lance and Manny are completely different.

 

no evidence on pac because he refused stricter tests multiple times, and not just against mayweather. orgs had tests on lance, they didnt on pac