Anyone else think it's a shame the most famous and best fighter in the world . . .

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by shaunster101, Apr 9, 2013.


  1. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    Who knows, who cares? Either way it has no bearing. That's my point.
     
  2. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Yes, because all the people in Britain who weren't fans of boxing before Hatton came along, but then like him for his personality and are now fans of the sport are in no way an example of the effect one fighter can have on the popularity of the sport . . .

    Sure the same applies to the people in Europe who weren't into boxing until the Klitschkos came along, and are now fans of the sport.


    But sure, one boxer can have no impact on the popularity of the sport. Not at all. It would be foolish to think so.
     
  3. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Yeah but those guys dont get paid like Floyd. People are just dumb and have only themselves to blame.
     
  4. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    They liked him because of his personality? Or because he was British? Why don't they support Wladimir Klitschko then? He's a nice guy.
     
  5. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    They sure don't.

    But I was asking so much about what a charismatic and likeable person could do for themselves, I was talking more about what they do help do for the sport.

    It seems the consensus is that if you want to make the most money possible then you need to play the villain. That's one side of the coin, the other is what I was more interested in.
     
  6. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    7,875
    12
    Mar 28, 2012
    Shaunster if you haven't already watched this, you should give this doco a go when you have the time:

    [yt]-y83kTl95qI[/yt]
     
  7. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Erm, for a start you're changing what we're talking about, which is that one fighter can have an impact on the wider sport. People took to Hatton like no British fighter before because of his personality, which was down to Earth, friendly and likeable. You'd be a fool to argue this. Because of him more people got into boxing, attended fights and became fans of the sports.

    All of which you said one person couldn't bring about on their own as their behaviour affects them and them only.
     
  8. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    I'll bookmark it, cheers mate.
     
  9. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    More people? You mean British people? Sure. Worldwide? NO.
     
  10. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Your point is flawed, to say the least. Floyd participates in a Niche sport which thrives off PPV sales and Premium cable subscribers. No one understands that model better than himself. As such, he plays the heel and generates massive exposure, massive casual public interest, and as a result the sport continues to be extremely profitable. What the f*ck are you talking about when you say it makes no difference to the sport how he is perceived? Of course it does!! If none of the guys in the top P4P rankings were able to draw in casual viewers through either a perception of their excitement, personality, nationality, etc, the sport would be much less profitable and the exposure would that much more limited.

    Are you going to tell me Tiger Woods didn't singlehandedly affect the sport of golf? Oh don't take me word on it, read this article. I guess the guy who wrote it and the facts he presented make him a f*cking idiot, too?

    http://golf-newz.com/tiger-effect
     
  11. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    I didn't know Tiger Woods affected golf because he was nice. I thought it was because he was f*cking incredible and also of mixed race which was highly unusual. Calm down cuz you're the one who sounds like a f*cking idiot :lol:
     
  12. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    This notion that you must play the villain to become the face of the sport, is nonsense. It helps, but it isn't the only way. Oscar and Pacquiao are recent examples of this.
     
  13. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Jesus. H Christ.

    I feel like a need a ****ing teaching qualification to talk to you.
     
  14. LikeFatherNSon

    LikeFatherNSon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,004
    4
    Jun 21, 2012
    No, you need to make f*cking sense. LOL @ Hatton having an impact because of his personality. Yeah, maybe among his kinsmen.

    You guys are f*cking peabrains. You think Mayweather had this persona his whole career? He was marketed as the Black Ray Leonard for his first 20/25 fights or so and was as popular as an undertaker. And you wanna be wistful about how he behaves might or might not attract people? So dumb. Take your b*tch ass idealogy to church, where how you smile woos unsuspecting old ladies.
     
  15. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    As for the question of: what impact would a well-mannered sportsman (in Floyd's shoes) have?

    In the UK, for one, he'd become a household name. Brits have a way of giving foreign superstars special treatment, and if an Andre Ward, for example, turned up to fight one of our fighters whilst being the face of boxing, the people here would adore him and he'd create a buzz around the sport like Hatton did.