Hopkins vs Calzaghe - who won? *2013 Poll*

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Joe.Boxer, Mar 13, 2013.


  1. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    hops didnt arguably win ****. jesus christ he did nothing
     
  2. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    12,389
    7
    Mar 5, 2012
    :deal
     
  3. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,240
    3,620
    Feb 20, 2008
    Hopkins did way too much Holding, Clinching, Wrestling, Grabbing, Faking low blows etc. to get the win. If he spent as much time actually punching as he did those things he might have won.

    Hopkins ruined what should have been a good fight for the fans. Not sure how anyone could score that fight for Hopkins.
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  4. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    No that's not true he held, bitched and fouled all night

    Cal was just to slick to welsh :lol:
     
  5. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,905
    11
    Sep 1, 2011
    He was. an he hurt bernard to the body with that "slap". People still throwin around the bernard is old **** too. Guy just won another belt . an held his own with dawson. Men bigger than calzaghe
     
  6. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    in an even fight Calzaghe won majority of the second half of the fight - 115-112


    If he was younger, he would have set a higher pace, true, but that means he would have opened up a bit more and less clinches, that favours JC's game more - would be better fight to watch as Hopkins would look to fight his fight instead of spoiling JC's, but that would also favour Joe, Bhop would always come up short against Joe, BHop schooled Pavlik right afterwards, he could have not done any better in his prime, JC was as aged as Hopkins in that fight - Hopkins wasn't that old in terms of fight years - fight was over half a decade ago. JC was a H2H great, at 168 only Roy would beat him, that even in a close fight.
     
  7. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
    Calzaghe.... All day, everyday !!!!!!
     
  8. travolt

    travolt Trolling the trolls Full Member

    3,486
    908
    Aug 1, 2011
    You cannot claim to have won while omitting to mention you needed a rest because the other guy was making you fight at a faster rate than you could sustain.

    Joe was setting up the pace of the fight, making BHOP spend more energy than he liked.

    Some BHOP proponents conveniently overlook this fact.
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  9. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,817
    19,075
    Jun 13, 2011
    Calzaghe won no doubt. "I'd never let a white boy beat me!" Lol Well on that night it happened homeboy
     
    Rudy likes this.
  10. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
    :good
     
  11. travolt

    travolt Trolling the trolls Full Member

    3,486
    908
    Aug 1, 2011
    Goes both ways.
    Joe admitted not to have trained optimally for the Hopkins fight, because he thought he could get to old Pop fatigued in the latter rds by setting a fast pace .

    He arguably did.

    But Pops decided then to look for a way out.


    The main thing is they both neutralized each other.

    Whatever better clean punching he did, Bhop lost the right to dispute the decision because he fought negatively all
    night long and attempted additionally to get an undeserved rest.
     
  12. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,099
    5,681
    Feb 26, 2009
  13. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    182
    May 16, 2009
    Calzaghe won the fight no doubt at all
     
  14. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,753
    11,818
    May 8, 2014