He wasn't technically robbed in the sense that the wrong man won, because I think Alvarez won a narrow fight. But the 118-109 card in particular was a travesty.
Trout voted for no. Some blind idiots here. There's a case for 6-6 and there still was a KD or 7-5 if you awarded Trouts ineffective work in some close rounds Canelo was doing the clean effective work, but robber? Get the **** out, keep robbery calls for actual ones while learning how to spot one.
No. The scoring was ****, but being as I thought he lost any way it makes no difference. 118-109 or 115-112, a loss is a loss. The people crying about this **** make it that much worse for when actual robberies occur. Crying wolf syndrome.
No , too close to be called a robbery. Canelo was the superior fighter. He's on another level. If he stepped it up consistently Trout wouldn't have seen the final bell.